Deen v. Loftis
Deen v. Loftis is a federal personal property / fraud lawsuit filed on 08/08/2003 in the District Court, W.D. Arkansas. The case was terminated on 02/25/2004.
A lawsuit records allegations and procedural activity. Being named as a party does not establish liability, wrongdoing, or the merits of any claim.
- Court
- District Court, W.D. Arkansas (W.D. Ark.)
Official Court Website → - Assigned judge
- Jimm Larry Hendren · 2,436 cases in index
- Docket number
- 3:03-cv-03063
- Nature of suit
- 380 Other personal property damage
Damage to or loss of personal property. - Jurisdiction
- Government defendant
- Date filed
- 08/08/2003
- Date terminated
- 02/25/2004
356 Personal Property / Fraud cases in this court are indexed here.
About Personal Property / Fraud Lawsuits
These cases involve damage to or loss of personal property, or claims of fraud and misrepresentation — including truth-in-lending and other deception-based claims.
Frequently Asked Questions
What is Deen v. Loftis?
Deen v. Loftis is a federal personal property / fraud lawsuit filed on 08/08/2003 in the District Court, W.D. Arkansas. The case was terminated on 02/25/2004. These cases involve damage to or loss of personal property, or claims of fraud and misrepresentation — including truth-in-lending and other deception-based claims.
What type of case is this?
It is classified as “Personal Property / Fraud” under the federal nature-of-suit system. These cases involve damage to or loss of personal property, or claims of fraud and misrepresentation — including truth-in-lending and other deception-based claims.
What court is the case in?
The case is in the District Court, W.D. Arkansas, docket number 3:03-cv-03063.
When was the case filed?
Deen v. Loftis was filed on 08/08/2003. It was terminated on 02/25/2004.
Other Cases Involving These Parties
Related Personal Property / Fraud Cases
Source: public U.S. federal court record — docket 11820984 in the CourtListener/RECAP archive (verify this docket), court docket number 3:03-cv-03063 on PACER. Court, party, date and judge fields are reproduced from that record; case-type categories, statute decoding and all aggregate figures are derived by Docket Nexus (methodology).