Demoore v. Rustad
Demoore v. Rustad is a federal patent lawsuit filed on 12/24/1987 in the District Court, D. Minnesota. The case was terminated on 04/11/1989.
A lawsuit records allegations and procedural activity. Being named as a party does not establish liability, wrongdoing, or the merits of any claim.
- Court
- District Court, D. Minnesota (D. Minnesota)
Official Court Website → - Assigned judge
- David S. Doty · 6,454 cases in index
- Docket number
- 4:87-cv-01090
- Nature of suit
- 830 Patent
Infringement of a patented invention. - Jurisdiction
- Federal question
- Date filed
- 12/24/1987
- Date terminated
- 04/11/1989
1,596 Patent cases in this court are indexed here.
About Patent Lawsuits
Patent lawsuits allege infringement of a patented invention — that another party made, used, or sold a protected technology without authorization. These cases are common in technology and pharmaceutical industries.
Frequently Asked Questions
What is Demoore v. Rustad?
Demoore v. Rustad is a federal patent lawsuit filed on 12/24/1987 in the District Court, D. Minnesota. The case was terminated on 04/11/1989. Patent lawsuits allege infringement of a patented invention — that another party made, used, or sold a protected technology without authorization. These cases are common in technology and pharmaceutical industries.
What type of case is this?
It is classified as “Patent” under the federal nature-of-suit system. Patent lawsuits allege infringement of a patented invention — that another party made, used, or sold a protected technology without authorization. These cases are common in technology and pharmaceutical industries.
What court is the case in?
The case is in the District Court, D. Minnesota, docket number 4:87-cv-01090.
When was the case filed?
Demoore v. Rustad was filed on 12/24/1987. It was terminated on 04/11/1989.
Other Cases Involving These Parties
Related Patent Cases
Source: public U.S. federal court record — docket 8866241 in the CourtListener/RECAP archive (verify this docket), court docket number 4:87-cv-01090 on PACER. Court, party, date and judge fields are reproduced from that record; case-type categories, statute decoding and all aggregate figures are derived by Docket Nexus (methodology).