Directv Inc v. Shaver
Directv Inc v. Shaver is a federal copyright lawsuit filed on 09/10/2003 in the District Court, N.D. Texas. The case was terminated on 08/03/2004.
A lawsuit records allegations and procedural activity. Being named as a party does not establish liability, wrongdoing, or the merits of any claim.
- Court
- District Court, N.D. Texas (N.D. Tex.)
Official Court Website → - Assigned judge
- John McBryde · 5,330 cases in index
- Docket number
- 4:03-cv-00953
- Nature of suit
- 820 Copyright
Infringement of copyrighted works. - Jurisdiction
- Federal question
- Date filed
- 09/10/2003
- Date terminated
- 08/03/2004
1,967 Copyright cases in this court are indexed here.
Parties
- plaintiff · Directv Inc · 10846 cases
- defendant · Shaver · 186 cases
About Copyright Lawsuits
Copyright lawsuits allege unauthorized use, copying, or distribution of creative works protected under the Copyright Act — including software, music, film, writing, and images.
Frequently Asked Questions
What is Directv Inc v. Shaver?
Directv Inc v. Shaver is a federal copyright lawsuit filed on 09/10/2003 in the District Court, N.D. Texas. The case was terminated on 08/03/2004. Copyright lawsuits allege unauthorized use, copying, or distribution of creative works protected under the Copyright Act — including software, music, film, writing, and images.
What type of case is this?
It is classified as “Copyright” under the federal nature-of-suit system. Copyright lawsuits allege unauthorized use, copying, or distribution of creative works protected under the Copyright Act — including software, music, film, writing, and images.
What court is the case in?
The case is in the District Court, N.D. Texas, docket number 4:03-cv-00953.
When was the case filed?
Directv Inc v. Shaver was filed on 09/10/2003. It was terminated on 08/03/2004.
Other Cases Involving These Parties
Related Copyright Cases
Source: public U.S. federal court record — docket 14059084 in the CourtListener/RECAP archive (verify this docket), court docket number 4:03-cv-00953 on PACER. Court, party, date and judge fields are reproduced from that record; case-type categories, statute decoding and all aggregate figures are derived by Docket Nexus (methodology).