Directv v. Kirby
Directv v. Kirby is a federal tax / statutory actions lawsuit filed on 01/23/2004 in the District Court, D. Montana. The case was terminated on 07/06/2004.
A lawsuit records allegations and procedural activity. Being named as a party does not establish liability, wrongdoing, or the merits of any claim.
- Court
- District Court, D. Montana (D. Mont.)
Official Court Website → - Assigned judge
- Richard F. Cebull · 813 cases in index
- Docket number
- 1:04-cv-00008
- Nature of suit
- 893 Environmental matters
Claims under federal environmental statutes. - Jurisdiction
- Government defendant
- Date filed
- 01/23/2004
- Date terminated
- 07/06/2004
1,252 Federal Tax / Statutory Actions cases in this court are indexed here.
About Federal Tax / Statutory Actions Lawsuits
This group covers federal tax disputes and other statutory actions, including IRS-related suits and claims arising under various federal regulatory statutes.
Frequently Asked Questions
What is Directv v. Kirby?
Directv v. Kirby is a federal tax / statutory actions lawsuit filed on 01/23/2004 in the District Court, D. Montana. The case was terminated on 07/06/2004. This group covers federal tax disputes and other statutory actions, including IRS-related suits and claims arising under various federal regulatory statutes.
What type of case is this?
It is classified as “Federal Tax / Statutory Actions” under the federal nature-of-suit system. This group covers federal tax disputes and other statutory actions, including IRS-related suits and claims arising under various federal regulatory statutes.
What court is the case in?
The case is in the District Court, D. Montana, docket number 1:04-cv-00008.
When was the case filed?
Directv v. Kirby was filed on 01/23/2004. It was terminated on 07/06/2004.
Other Cases Involving These Parties
Related Federal Tax / Statutory Actions Cases
Source: public U.S. federal court record — docket 14082819 in the CourtListener/RECAP archive (verify this docket), court docket number 1:04-cv-00008 on PACER. Court, party, date and judge fields are reproduced from that record; case-type categories, statute decoding and all aggregate figures are derived by Docket Nexus (methodology).