Ditto v. Peterson Properties
Ditto v. Peterson Properties is a federal contract lawsuit filed on 07/06/2022 in the District Court, N.D. California. The case was terminated on 09/26/2022.
A lawsuit records allegations and procedural activity. Being named as a party does not establish liability, wrongdoing, or the merits of any claim.
- Court
- District Court, N.D. California (N.D. Cal.)
Official Court Website → - Assigned judge
- Haywood S Gilliam, Jr · 1,118 cases in index
- Docket number
- 4:22-cv-03957
- Cause
- 28:1346 Breach of Contract
28 U.S.C. § 1346 — United States as defendant - Nature of suit
- 190 Contract: Other
General breach-of-contract disputes not covered by a more specific category. - Jurisdiction
- Federal Question
- Jury demand
- Plaintiff
- Date filed
- 07/06/2022
- Date terminated
- 09/26/2022
25,026 Contract cases in this court are indexed here.
Parties
- plaintiff · Ditto · 47 cases
- defendant · Peterson Properties · 5 cases
Other Cases Naming This Defendant
Peterson Properties is named in 5 federal civil cases in this index. Recent Contract cases naming the same defendant:
About Contract Lawsuits
Contract lawsuits involve disputes over an agreement between parties — claims that one side failed to perform, breached a term, or owes money under a contract. Common examples include unpaid invoices, broken business deals, and warranty or insurance disputes.
Frequently Asked Questions
What is Ditto v. Peterson Properties?
Ditto v. Peterson Properties is a federal contract lawsuit filed on 07/06/2022 in the District Court, N.D. California. The case was terminated on 09/26/2022. Contract lawsuits involve disputes over an agreement between parties — claims that one side failed to perform, breached a term, or owes money under a contract. Common examples include unpaid invoices, broken business deals, and warranty or insurance disputes.
What type of case is this?
It is classified as “Contract” under the federal nature-of-suit system. Contract lawsuits involve disputes over an agreement between parties — claims that one side failed to perform, breached a term, or owes money under a contract. Common examples include unpaid invoices, broken business deals, and warranty or insurance disputes.
What court is the case in?
The case is in the District Court, N.D. California, docket number 4:22-cv-03957.
When was the case filed?
Ditto v. Peterson Properties was filed on 07/06/2022. It was terminated on 09/26/2022.
What law is the case brought under?
The docket lists the cause as 28 U.S.C. § 1346 — United States as defendant.
Other Cases Involving These Parties
Related Contract Cases
Source: public U.S. federal court record — docket 63577435 in the CourtListener/RECAP archive (verify this docket), court docket number 4:22-cv-03957 on PACER. Court, party, date and judge fields are reproduced from that record; case-type categories, statute decoding and all aggregate figures are derived by Docket Nexus (methodology).