Doe 2 v. Haslam
Doe 2 v. Haslam is a federal other civil lawsuit filed on 02/08/2017 in the District Court, M.D. Tennessee. The case was terminated on 04/05/2021.
A lawsuit records allegations and procedural activity. Being named as a party does not establish liability, wrongdoing, or the merits of any claim.
- Court
- District Court, M.D. Tennessee (M.D. Tenn.)
Official Court Website → - Assigned judge
- Eli J. Richardson · 766 cases in index
- Docket number
- 3:17-cv-00264
- Cause
- 42:1983 Civil Rights Act
42 U.S.C. § 1983 — Civil rights (deprivation under color of law) - Nature of suit
- 950 Constitutional - State Statute
Challenges to the constitutionality of a state statute. - Jurisdiction
- Federal Question
- Jury demand
- None
- Date filed
- 02/08/2017
- Date terminated
- 04/05/2021
207 Other Civil cases in this court are indexed here.
About Other Civil Lawsuits
These are federal civil cases that do not fall under a more specific nature-of-suit category.
Frequently Asked Questions
What is Doe 2 v. Haslam?
Doe 2 v. Haslam is a federal other civil lawsuit filed on 02/08/2017 in the District Court, M.D. Tennessee. The case was terminated on 04/05/2021. These are federal civil cases that do not fall under a more specific nature-of-suit category.
What type of case is this?
It is classified as “Other Civil” under the federal nature-of-suit system. These are federal civil cases that do not fall under a more specific nature-of-suit category.
What court is the case in?
The case is in the District Court, M.D. Tennessee, docket number 3:17-cv-00264.
When was the case filed?
Doe 2 v. Haslam was filed on 02/08/2017. It was terminated on 04/05/2021.
What law is the case brought under?
The docket lists the cause as 42 U.S.C. § 1983 — Civil rights (deprivation under color of law).
Other Cases Involving These Parties
Related Other Civil Cases
Source: public U.S. federal court record — docket 8062326 in the CourtListener/RECAP archive (verify this docket), court docket number 3:17-cv-00264 on PACER. Court, party, date and judge fields are reproduced from that record; case-type categories, statute decoding and all aggregate figures are derived by Docket Nexus (methodology).