Doe v. Amedisys, Inc
Doe v. Amedisys, Inc is a federal other civil lawsuit filed on 02/19/2015 in the District Court, M.D. Louisiana. The case was terminated on 09/29/2015.
A lawsuit records allegations and procedural activity. Being named as a party does not establish liability, wrongdoing, or the merits of any claim.
- Court
- District Court, M.D. Louisiana (M.D. La.)
Official Court Website → - Assigned judge
- James J. Brady · 1,873 cases in index
- Docket number
- 3:15-cv-00087
- Nature of suit
- 375 False Claims Act
Claims that a party defrauded the federal government, under the False Claims Act. - Jurisdiction
- Federal question
- Date filed
- 02/19/2015
- Date terminated
- 09/29/2015
185 Other Civil cases in this court are indexed here.
Parties
- plaintiff · Doe · 13529 cases
- defendant · Amedisys, Inc · 53 cases
Other Cases Naming This Defendant
Amedisys, Inc is named in 53 federal civil cases in this index. Recent Other Civil cases naming the same defendant:
About Other Civil Lawsuits
These are federal civil cases that do not fall under a more specific nature-of-suit category.
Frequently Asked Questions
What is Doe v. Amedisys, Inc?
Doe v. Amedisys, Inc is a federal other civil lawsuit filed on 02/19/2015 in the District Court, M.D. Louisiana. The case was terminated on 09/29/2015. These are federal civil cases that do not fall under a more specific nature-of-suit category.
What type of case is this?
It is classified as “Other Civil” under the federal nature-of-suit system. These are federal civil cases that do not fall under a more specific nature-of-suit category.
What court is the case in?
The case is in the District Court, M.D. Louisiana, docket number 3:15-cv-00087.
When was the case filed?
Doe v. Amedisys, Inc was filed on 02/19/2015. It was terminated on 09/29/2015.
Other Cases Involving These Parties
Related Other Civil Cases
Source: public U.S. federal court record — docket 13182029 in the CourtListener/RECAP archive (verify this docket), court docket number 3:15-cv-00087 on PACER. Court, party, date and judge fields are reproduced from that record; case-type categories, statute decoding and all aggregate figures are derived by Docket Nexus (methodology).