Donnelly v. Hudson
Donnelly v. Hudson is a federal other civil lawsuit filed on 04/05/2018 in the District Court, M.D. Florida. The case was terminated on 05/08/2018.
A lawsuit records allegations and procedural activity. Being named as a party does not establish liability, wrongdoing, or the merits of any claim.
- Court
- District Court, M.D. Florida (M.D. Fla.)
Official Court Website → - Assigned judge
- Carlos E. Mendoza · 2,344 cases in index
- Docket number
- 6:18-cv-00525
- Cause
- 42:1983 Civil Rights Act
42 U.S.C. § 1983 — Civil rights (deprivation under color of law) - Nature of suit
- 290 Real Property: Other
Real-property disputes not covered by a more specific category. - Jurisdiction
- Federal Question
- Jury demand
- None
- Date filed
- 04/05/2018
- Date terminated
- 05/08/2018
1,248 Other Civil cases in this court are indexed here.
About Other Civil Lawsuits
These are federal civil cases that do not fall under a more specific nature-of-suit category.
Frequently Asked Questions
What is Donnelly v. Hudson?
Donnelly v. Hudson is a federal other civil lawsuit filed on 04/05/2018 in the District Court, M.D. Florida. The case was terminated on 05/08/2018. These are federal civil cases that do not fall under a more specific nature-of-suit category.
What type of case is this?
It is classified as “Other Civil” under the federal nature-of-suit system. These are federal civil cases that do not fall under a more specific nature-of-suit category.
What court is the case in?
The case is in the District Court, M.D. Florida, docket number 6:18-cv-00525.
When was the case filed?
Donnelly v. Hudson was filed on 04/05/2018. It was terminated on 05/08/2018.
What law is the case brought under?
The docket lists the cause as 42 U.S.C. § 1983 — Civil rights (deprivation under color of law).
Other Cases Involving These Parties
Related Other Civil Cases
Source: public U.S. federal court record — docket 6507536 in the CourtListener/RECAP archive (verify this docket), court docket number 6:18-cv-00525 on PACER. Court, party, date and judge fields are reproduced from that record; case-type categories, statute decoding and all aggregate figures are derived by Docket Nexus (methodology).