Doolittle v. Springman Etal
Doolittle v. Springman Etal is a federal tax / statutory actions lawsuit filed on 11/15/1988 in the District Court, N.D. Indiana. The case was terminated on 11/29/1989.
A lawsuit records allegations and procedural activity. Being named as a party does not establish liability, wrongdoing, or the merits of any claim.
- Court
- District Court, N.D. Indiana (N.D. Ind.)
Official Court Website → - Docket number
- —
- Nature of suit
- 890 Other statutory actions
Federal statutory claims not covered by a more specific category. - Jurisdiction
- Federal question
- Date filed
- 11/15/1988
- Date terminated
- 11/29/1989
1,646 Federal Tax / Statutory Actions cases in this court are indexed here.
Parties
- plaintiff · Doolittle · 70 cases
- defendant · Springman Etal
About Federal Tax / Statutory Actions Lawsuits
This group covers federal tax disputes and other statutory actions, including IRS-related suits and claims arising under various federal regulatory statutes.
Frequently Asked Questions
What is Doolittle v. Springman Etal?
Doolittle v. Springman Etal is a federal tax / statutory actions lawsuit filed on 11/15/1988 in the District Court, N.D. Indiana. The case was terminated on 11/29/1989. This group covers federal tax disputes and other statutory actions, including IRS-related suits and claims arising under various federal regulatory statutes.
What type of case is this?
It is classified as “Federal Tax / Statutory Actions” under the federal nature-of-suit system. This group covers federal tax disputes and other statutory actions, including IRS-related suits and claims arising under various federal regulatory statutes.
What court is the case in?
The case is in the District Court, N.D. Indiana.
When was the case filed?
Doolittle v. Springman Etal was filed on 11/15/1988. It was terminated on 11/29/1989.
Other Cases Involving These Parties
Related Federal Tax / Statutory Actions Cases
Source: public U.S. federal court record — docket 8856629 in the CourtListener/RECAP archive (verify this docket). Court, party, date and judge fields are reproduced from that record; case-type categories, statute decoding and all aggregate figures are derived by Docket Nexus (methodology).