Doyal v. Fha
Doyal v. Fha is a federal tax / statutory actions lawsuit filed on 03/20/1996 in the District Court, D. New Mexico. The case was terminated on 02/27/1997.
A lawsuit records allegations and procedural activity. Being named as a party does not establish liability, wrongdoing, or the merits of any claim.
- Court
- District Court, D. New Mexico (D.N.M.)
Official Court Website → - Assigned judge
- John E. Conway · 1,386 cases in index
- Docket number
- 1:96-cv-00375
- Nature of suit
- 890 Other statutory actions
Federal statutory claims not covered by a more specific category. - Jurisdiction
- Government defendant
- Date filed
- 03/20/1996
- Date terminated
- 02/27/1997
2,110 Federal Tax / Statutory Actions cases in this court are indexed here.
About Federal Tax / Statutory Actions Lawsuits
This group covers federal tax disputes and other statutory actions, including IRS-related suits and claims arising under various federal regulatory statutes.
Frequently Asked Questions
What is Doyal v. Fha?
Doyal v. Fha is a federal tax / statutory actions lawsuit filed on 03/20/1996 in the District Court, D. New Mexico. The case was terminated on 02/27/1997. This group covers federal tax disputes and other statutory actions, including IRS-related suits and claims arising under various federal regulatory statutes.
What type of case is this?
It is classified as “Federal Tax / Statutory Actions” under the federal nature-of-suit system. This group covers federal tax disputes and other statutory actions, including IRS-related suits and claims arising under various federal regulatory statutes.
What court is the case in?
The case is in the District Court, D. New Mexico, docket number 1:96-cv-00375.
When was the case filed?
Doyal v. Fha was filed on 03/20/1996. It was terminated on 02/27/1997.
Other Cases Involving These Parties
Related Federal Tax / Statutory Actions Cases
Source: public U.S. federal court record — docket 10463808 in the CourtListener/RECAP archive (verify this docket), court docket number 1:96-cv-00375 on PACER. Court, party, date and judge fields are reproduced from that record; case-type categories, statute decoding and all aggregate figures are derived by Docket Nexus (methodology).