Ealy v. Andrews
Ealy v. Andrews is a federal personal property / fraud lawsuit filed on 06/02/2003 in the District Court, S.D. Ohio. The case was terminated on 02/13/2004.
A lawsuit records allegations and procedural activity. Being named as a party does not establish liability, wrongdoing, or the merits of any claim.
- Court
- District Court, S.D. Ohio (S.D. Ohio)
Official Court Website → - Assigned judge
- Thomas M. Rose · 1,318 cases in index
- Docket number
- 3:03-cv-00195
- Nature of suit
- 370 Other fraud
Fraud or misrepresentation claims not covered by a more specific category. - Jurisdiction
- Federal question
- Date filed
- 06/02/2003
- Date terminated
- 02/13/2004
1,442 Personal Property / Fraud cases in this court are indexed here.
About Personal Property / Fraud Lawsuits
These cases involve damage to or loss of personal property, or claims of fraud and misrepresentation — including truth-in-lending and other deception-based claims.
Frequently Asked Questions
What is Ealy v. Andrews?
Ealy v. Andrews is a federal personal property / fraud lawsuit filed on 06/02/2003 in the District Court, S.D. Ohio. The case was terminated on 02/13/2004. These cases involve damage to or loss of personal property, or claims of fraud and misrepresentation — including truth-in-lending and other deception-based claims.
What type of case is this?
It is classified as “Personal Property / Fraud” under the federal nature-of-suit system. These cases involve damage to or loss of personal property, or claims of fraud and misrepresentation — including truth-in-lending and other deception-based claims.
What court is the case in?
The case is in the District Court, S.D. Ohio, docket number 3:03-cv-00195.
When was the case filed?
Ealy v. Andrews was filed on 06/02/2003. It was terminated on 02/13/2004.
Other Cases Involving These Parties
Related Personal Property / Fraud Cases
Source: public U.S. federal court record — docket 28178795 in the CourtListener/RECAP archive (verify this docket), court docket number 3:03-cv-00195 on PACER. Court, party, date and judge fields are reproduced from that record; case-type categories, statute decoding and all aggregate figures are derived by Docket Nexus (methodology).