Docket Nexus — Federal court records.
Personal Property / Fraud Lawsuit

Earl Gingerich v. US

Personal Property / Fraud Terminated 01/25/1988 District Court, D. Oregon

Earl Gingerich v. US is a federal personal property / fraud lawsuit filed on 05/20/1986 in the District Court, D. Oregon. The case was terminated on 01/25/1988.

A lawsuit records allegations and procedural activity. Being named as a party does not establish liability, wrongdoing, or the merits of any claim.

Court
District Court, D. Oregon (D. Or.)
Official Court Website →
Docket number
Nature of suit
380 Other personal property damage
Damage to or loss of personal property.
Jurisdiction
Government defendant
Date filed
05/20/1986
Date terminated
01/25/1988

1,132 Personal Property / Fraud cases in this court are indexed here.

Parties

About Personal Property / Fraud Lawsuits

These cases involve damage to or loss of personal property, or claims of fraud and misrepresentation — including truth-in-lending and other deception-based claims.

Frequently Asked Questions

What is Earl Gingerich v. US?

Earl Gingerich v. US is a federal personal property / fraud lawsuit filed on 05/20/1986 in the District Court, D. Oregon. The case was terminated on 01/25/1988. These cases involve damage to or loss of personal property, or claims of fraud and misrepresentation — including truth-in-lending and other deception-based claims.

What type of case is this?

It is classified as “Personal Property / Fraud” under the federal nature-of-suit system. These cases involve damage to or loss of personal property, or claims of fraud and misrepresentation — including truth-in-lending and other deception-based claims.

What court is the case in?

The case is in the District Court, D. Oregon.

When was the case filed?

Earl Gingerich v. US was filed on 05/20/1986. It was terminated on 01/25/1988.

Related Personal Property / Fraud Cases

Source: public U.S. federal court record — docket 8700713 in the CourtListener/RECAP archive (verify this docket). Court, party, date and judge fields are reproduced from that record; case-type categories, statute decoding and all aggregate figures are derived by Docket Nexus (methodology).