Eastman Chemical Company v. PlastiPure, Inc

Court

District Court, W.D. Texas (W.D. Tex.)
Official Court Website →

Assigned judge

Sam Sparks · 5,561 cases in index

Docket number

1:12-cv-00057

Cause

28:1338 Trademark Infringement
28 U.S.C. § 1338 — Patent, copyright & trademark jurisdiction

Nature of suit

840 Trademark
Infringement or dilution of a trademark under the Lanham Act.

Jurisdiction

Federal Question

Jury demand

Plaintiff

Date filed

01/18/2012

Date terminated

08/30/2013

1,402 Trademark cases in this court are indexed here.

Parties

• plaintiff · Eastman Chemical Co Chemical Manufacturing · 92 cases
• defendant · PlastiPure, Inc

Part of a Larger Litigation Pattern

This is one of 2 Trademark cases in our index naming PlastiPure, Inc — a possible mass-tort or coordinated-litigation cluster.

About Trademark Lawsuits

Trademark lawsuits allege infringement or dilution of a brand name, logo, or other mark under the Lanham Act — typically claims that one party's use is likely to confuse consumers about the source of goods or services.

Frequently Asked Questions

What is Eastman Chemical Company v. PlastiPure, Inc?

Eastman Chemical Company v. PlastiPure, Inc is a federal trademark lawsuit filed on 01/18/2012 in the District Court, W.D. Texas. The case was terminated on 08/30/2013. Trademark lawsuits allege infringement or dilution of a brand name, logo, or other mark under the Lanham Act — typically claims that one party's use is likely to confuse consumers about the source of goods or services.

What type of case is this?

It is classified as “Trademark” under the federal nature-of-suit system. Trademark lawsuits allege infringement or dilution of a brand name, logo, or other mark under the Lanham Act — typically claims that one party's use is likely to confuse consumers about the source of goods or services.

What court is the case in?

The case is in the District Court, W.D. Texas, docket number 1:12-cv-00057.

When was the case filed?

Eastman Chemical Company v. PlastiPure, Inc was filed on 01/18/2012. It was terminated on 08/30/2013.

What law is the case brought under?

The docket lists the cause as 28 U.S.C. § 1338 — Patent, copyright & trademark jurisdiction.