Ebert v. Lyng
Ebert v. Lyng is a federal tax / statutory actions lawsuit filed on 08/06/1987 in the District Court, E.D. Washington. The case was terminated on 09/13/1988.
A lawsuit records allegations and procedural activity. Being named as a party does not establish liability, wrongdoing, or the merits of any claim.
- Court
- District Court, E.D. Washington (E.D. Wash.)
Official Court Website → - Assigned judge
- Robert J. McNichols · 381 cases in index
- Docket number
- 2:87-cv-00474
- Nature of suit
- 891 Agricultural acts
Disputes under federal agricultural statutes. - Jurisdiction
- Government defendant
- Date filed
- 08/06/1987
- Date terminated
- 09/13/1988
1,090 Federal Tax / Statutory Actions cases in this court are indexed here.
About Federal Tax / Statutory Actions Lawsuits
This group covers federal tax disputes and other statutory actions, including IRS-related suits and claims arising under various federal regulatory statutes.
Frequently Asked Questions
What is Ebert v. Lyng?
Ebert v. Lyng is a federal tax / statutory actions lawsuit filed on 08/06/1987 in the District Court, E.D. Washington. The case was terminated on 09/13/1988. This group covers federal tax disputes and other statutory actions, including IRS-related suits and claims arising under various federal regulatory statutes.
What type of case is this?
It is classified as “Federal Tax / Statutory Actions” under the federal nature-of-suit system. This group covers federal tax disputes and other statutory actions, including IRS-related suits and claims arising under various federal regulatory statutes.
What court is the case in?
The case is in the District Court, E.D. Washington, docket number 2:87-cv-00474.
When was the case filed?
Ebert v. Lyng was filed on 08/06/1987. It was terminated on 09/13/1988.
Other Cases Involving These Parties
Related Federal Tax / Statutory Actions Cases
Source: public U.S. federal court record — docket 8899960 in the CourtListener/RECAP archive (verify this docket), court docket number 2:87-cv-00474 on PACER. Court, party, date and judge fields are reproduced from that record; case-type categories, statute decoding and all aggregate figures are derived by Docket Nexus (methodology).