Ellis v. Alman
Ellis v. Alman is a federal tax / statutory actions lawsuit filed on 11/19/1993 in the District Court, D. Massachusetts. The case was terminated on 07/17/1995.
A lawsuit records allegations and procedural activity. Being named as a party does not establish liability, wrongdoing, or the merits of any claim.
- Court
- District Court, D. Massachusetts (D. Mass.)
Official Court Website → - Assigned judge
- George A. OToole, Jr · 3,340 cases in index
- Docket number
- 1:93-cv-12528
- Nature of suit
- 870 Tax suits
Federal tax disputes with the United States as a party. - Jurisdiction
- Government defendant
- Date filed
- 11/19/1993
- Date terminated
- 07/17/1995
8,000 Federal Tax / Statutory Actions cases in this court are indexed here.
About Federal Tax / Statutory Actions Lawsuits
This group covers federal tax disputes and other statutory actions, including IRS-related suits and claims arising under various federal regulatory statutes.
Frequently Asked Questions
What is Ellis v. Alman?
Ellis v. Alman is a federal tax / statutory actions lawsuit filed on 11/19/1993 in the District Court, D. Massachusetts. The case was terminated on 07/17/1995. This group covers federal tax disputes and other statutory actions, including IRS-related suits and claims arising under various federal regulatory statutes.
What type of case is this?
It is classified as “Federal Tax / Statutory Actions” under the federal nature-of-suit system. This group covers federal tax disputes and other statutory actions, including IRS-related suits and claims arising under various federal regulatory statutes.
What court is the case in?
The case is in the District Court, D. Massachusetts, docket number 1:93-cv-12528.
When was the case filed?
Ellis v. Alman was filed on 11/19/1993. It was terminated on 07/17/1995.
Other Cases Involving These Parties
Related Federal Tax / Statutory Actions Cases
Source: public U.S. federal court record — docket 9902575 in the CourtListener/RECAP archive (verify this docket), court docket number 1:93-cv-12528 on PACER. Court, party, date and judge fields are reproduced from that record; case-type categories, statute decoding and all aggregate figures are derived by Docket Nexus (methodology).