Epperly v. Potter
Epperly v. Potter is a federal other civil lawsuit filed on 08/14/2017 in the District Court, D. Alaska. The case was terminated on 11/01/2017.
A lawsuit records allegations and procedural activity. Being named as a party does not establish liability, wrongdoing, or the merits of any claim.
- Court
- District Court, D. Alaska (D. Alaska)
Official Court Website → - Assigned judge
- Sharon L. Gleason · 597 cases in index
- Docket number
- 1:17-cv-00008
- Cause
- 42:1983 Civil Rights Act
42 U.S.C. § 1983 — Civil rights (deprivation under color of law) - Nature of suit
- 290 Real Property: Other
Real-property disputes not covered by a more specific category. - Jurisdiction
- U.S. Government Defendant
- Jury demand
- None
- Date filed
- 08/14/2017
- Date terminated
- 11/01/2017
278 Other Civil cases in this court are indexed here.
About Other Civil Lawsuits
These are federal civil cases that do not fall under a more specific nature-of-suit category.
Frequently Asked Questions
What is Epperly v. Potter?
Epperly v. Potter is a federal other civil lawsuit filed on 08/14/2017 in the District Court, D. Alaska. The case was terminated on 11/01/2017. These are federal civil cases that do not fall under a more specific nature-of-suit category.
What type of case is this?
It is classified as “Other Civil” under the federal nature-of-suit system. These are federal civil cases that do not fall under a more specific nature-of-suit category.
What court is the case in?
The case is in the District Court, D. Alaska, docket number 1:17-cv-00008.
When was the case filed?
Epperly v. Potter was filed on 08/14/2017. It was terminated on 11/01/2017.
What law is the case brought under?
The docket lists the cause as 42 U.S.C. § 1983 — Civil rights (deprivation under color of law).
Other Cases Involving These Parties
Related Other Civil Cases
Source: public U.S. federal court record — docket 8498877 in the CourtListener/RECAP archive (verify this docket), court docket number 1:17-cv-00008 on PACER. Court, party, date and judge fields are reproduced from that record; case-type categories, statute decoding and all aggregate figures are derived by Docket Nexus (methodology).