Ernst v. Smartalk
Ernst v. Smartalk is a federal personal property / fraud lawsuit filed on 12/11/1998 in the District Court, S.D. Ohio. The case was terminated on 07/27/1999.
A lawsuit records allegations and procedural activity. Being named as a party does not establish liability, wrongdoing, or the merits of any claim.
- Court
- District Court, S.D. Ohio (S.D. Ohio)
Official Court Website → - Assigned judge
- Edmund A Sargus · 2,398 cases in index
- Docket number
- 2:98-cv-01249
- Nature of suit
- 370 Other fraud
Fraud or misrepresentation claims not covered by a more specific category. - Jurisdiction
- Diversity of citizenship
- Date filed
- 12/11/1998
- Date terminated
- 07/27/1999
1,442 Personal Property / Fraud cases in this court are indexed here.
About Personal Property / Fraud Lawsuits
These cases involve damage to or loss of personal property, or claims of fraud and misrepresentation — including truth-in-lending and other deception-based claims.
Frequently Asked Questions
What is Ernst v. Smartalk?
Ernst v. Smartalk is a federal personal property / fraud lawsuit filed on 12/11/1998 in the District Court, S.D. Ohio. The case was terminated on 07/27/1999. These cases involve damage to or loss of personal property, or claims of fraud and misrepresentation — including truth-in-lending and other deception-based claims.
What type of case is this?
It is classified as “Personal Property / Fraud” under the federal nature-of-suit system. These cases involve damage to or loss of personal property, or claims of fraud and misrepresentation — including truth-in-lending and other deception-based claims.
What court is the case in?
The case is in the District Court, S.D. Ohio, docket number 2:98-cv-01249.
When was the case filed?
Ernst v. Smartalk was filed on 12/11/1998. It was terminated on 07/27/1999.
Other Cases Involving These Parties
Related Personal Property / Fraud Cases
Source: public U.S. federal court record — docket 10802989 in the CourtListener/RECAP archive (verify this docket), court docket number 2:98-cv-01249 on PACER. Court, party, date and judge fields are reproduced from that record; case-type categories, statute decoding and all aggregate figures are derived by Docket Nexus (methodology).