Evans v. McIntee
Evans v. McIntee is a federal personal property / fraud lawsuit filed on 04/11/1995 in the District Court, D. Montana. The case was terminated on 10/04/1996.
A lawsuit records allegations and procedural activity. Being named as a party does not establish liability, wrongdoing, or the merits of any claim.
- Court
- District Court, D. Montana (D. Mont.)
Official Court Website → - Assigned judge
- Paul G. Hatfield · 702 cases in index
- Docket number
- 4:95-cv-00036
- Nature of suit
- 380 Other personal property damage
Damage to or loss of personal property. - Jurisdiction
- Diversity of citizenship
- Date filed
- 04/11/1995
- Date terminated
- 10/04/1996
386 Personal Property / Fraud cases in this court are indexed here.
About Personal Property / Fraud Lawsuits
These cases involve damage to or loss of personal property, or claims of fraud and misrepresentation — including truth-in-lending and other deception-based claims.
Frequently Asked Questions
What is Evans v. McIntee?
Evans v. McIntee is a federal personal property / fraud lawsuit filed on 04/11/1995 in the District Court, D. Montana. The case was terminated on 10/04/1996. These cases involve damage to or loss of personal property, or claims of fraud and misrepresentation — including truth-in-lending and other deception-based claims.
What type of case is this?
It is classified as “Personal Property / Fraud” under the federal nature-of-suit system. These cases involve damage to or loss of personal property, or claims of fraud and misrepresentation — including truth-in-lending and other deception-based claims.
What court is the case in?
The case is in the District Court, D. Montana, docket number 4:95-cv-00036.
When was the case filed?
Evans v. McIntee was filed on 04/11/1995. It was terminated on 10/04/1996.
Other Cases Involving These Parties
Related Personal Property / Fraud Cases
Source: public U.S. federal court record — docket 20848786 in the CourtListener/RECAP archive (verify this docket), court docket number 4:95-cv-00036 on PACER. Court, party, date and judge fields are reproduced from that record; case-type categories, statute decoding and all aggregate figures are derived by Docket Nexus (methodology).