Faquir v. Hud
Faquir v. Hud is a federal tax / statutory actions lawsuit filed on 12/03/1997 in the District Court, S.D. Ohio. The case was terminated on 12/23/1997.
A lawsuit records allegations and procedural activity. Being named as a party does not establish liability, wrongdoing, or the merits of any claim.
- Court
- District Court, S.D. Ohio (S.D. Ohio)
Official Court Website → - Assigned judge
- Sandra S Beckwith · 3,015 cases in index
- Docket number
- 1:97-cv-01068
- Nature of suit
- 890 Other statutory actions
Federal statutory claims not covered by a more specific category. - Jurisdiction
- Government defendant
- Date filed
- 12/03/1997
- Date terminated
- 12/23/1997
4,598 Federal Tax / Statutory Actions cases in this court are indexed here.
About Federal Tax / Statutory Actions Lawsuits
This group covers federal tax disputes and other statutory actions, including IRS-related suits and claims arising under various federal regulatory statutes.
Frequently Asked Questions
What is Faquir v. Hud?
Faquir v. Hud is a federal tax / statutory actions lawsuit filed on 12/03/1997 in the District Court, S.D. Ohio. The case was terminated on 12/23/1997. This group covers federal tax disputes and other statutory actions, including IRS-related suits and claims arising under various federal regulatory statutes.
What type of case is this?
It is classified as “Federal Tax / Statutory Actions” under the federal nature-of-suit system. This group covers federal tax disputes and other statutory actions, including IRS-related suits and claims arising under various federal regulatory statutes.
What court is the case in?
The case is in the District Court, S.D. Ohio, docket number 1:97-cv-01068.
When was the case filed?
Faquir v. Hud was filed on 12/03/1997. It was terminated on 12/23/1997.
Other Cases Involving These Parties
Related Federal Tax / Statutory Actions Cases
Source: public U.S. federal court record — docket 10603548 in the CourtListener/RECAP archive (verify this docket), court docket number 1:97-cv-01068 on PACER. Court, party, date and judge fields are reproduced from that record; case-type categories, statute decoding and all aggregate figures are derived by Docket Nexus (methodology).