Fate Music v. Wolf
Fate Music v. Wolf is a federal copyright lawsuit filed on 07/14/1999 in the District Court, D. Vermont. The case was terminated on 10/29/1999.
A lawsuit records allegations and procedural activity. Being named as a party does not establish liability, wrongdoing, or the merits of any claim.
- Court
- District Court, D. Vermont (D. Vt.)
Official Court Website → - Assigned judge
- J. Garvan Murtha · 1,219 cases in index
- Docket number
- 1:99-cv-00198
- Nature of suit
- 820 Copyright
Infringement of copyrighted works. - Jurisdiction
- Federal question
- Date filed
- 07/14/1999
- Date terminated
- 10/29/1999
121 Copyright cases in this court are indexed here.
Parties
- plaintiff · Fate Music · 14 cases
- defendant · Wolf · 977 cases
About Copyright Lawsuits
Copyright lawsuits allege unauthorized use, copying, or distribution of creative works protected under the Copyright Act — including software, music, film, writing, and images.
Frequently Asked Questions
What is Fate Music v. Wolf?
Fate Music v. Wolf is a federal copyright lawsuit filed on 07/14/1999 in the District Court, D. Vermont. The case was terminated on 10/29/1999. Copyright lawsuits allege unauthorized use, copying, or distribution of creative works protected under the Copyright Act — including software, music, film, writing, and images.
What type of case is this?
It is classified as “Copyright” under the federal nature-of-suit system. Copyright lawsuits allege unauthorized use, copying, or distribution of creative works protected under the Copyright Act — including software, music, film, writing, and images.
What court is the case in?
The case is in the District Court, D. Vermont, docket number 1:99-cv-00198.
When was the case filed?
Fate Music v. Wolf was filed on 07/14/1999. It was terminated on 10/29/1999.
Other Cases Involving These Parties
Related Copyright Cases
Source: public U.S. federal court record — docket 10957003 in the CourtListener/RECAP archive (verify this docket), court docket number 1:99-cv-00198 on PACER. Court, party, date and judge fields are reproduced from that record; case-type categories, statute decoding and all aggregate figures are derived by Docket Nexus (methodology).