Fdic v. Antonio
Fdic v. Antonio is a federal tax / statutory actions lawsuit filed on 11/13/1986 in the District Court, N.D. Ohio. The case was terminated on 04/08/1992.
A lawsuit records allegations and procedural activity. Being named as a party does not establish liability, wrongdoing, or the merits of any claim.
- Court
- District Court, N.D. Ohio (N.D. Ohio)
Official Court Website → - Assigned judge
- John W. Potter · 796 cases in index
- Docket number
- 3:86-cv-07860
- Nature of suit
- 890 Other statutory actions
Federal statutory claims not covered by a more specific category. - Jurisdiction
- Federal question
- Date filed
- 11/13/1986
- Date terminated
- 04/08/1992
5,824 Federal Tax / Statutory Actions cases in this court are indexed here.
About Federal Tax / Statutory Actions Lawsuits
This group covers federal tax disputes and other statutory actions, including IRS-related suits and claims arising under various federal regulatory statutes.
Frequently Asked Questions
What is Fdic v. Antonio?
Fdic v. Antonio is a federal tax / statutory actions lawsuit filed on 11/13/1986 in the District Court, N.D. Ohio. The case was terminated on 04/08/1992. This group covers federal tax disputes and other statutory actions, including IRS-related suits and claims arising under various federal regulatory statutes.
What type of case is this?
It is classified as “Federal Tax / Statutory Actions” under the federal nature-of-suit system. This group covers federal tax disputes and other statutory actions, including IRS-related suits and claims arising under various federal regulatory statutes.
What court is the case in?
The case is in the District Court, N.D. Ohio, docket number 3:86-cv-07860.
When was the case filed?
Fdic v. Antonio was filed on 11/13/1986. It was terminated on 04/08/1992.
Other Cases Involving These Parties
Related Federal Tax / Statutory Actions Cases
Source: public U.S. federal court record — docket 9408290 in the CourtListener/RECAP archive (verify this docket), court docket number 3:86-cv-07860 on PACER. Court, party, date and judge fields are reproduced from that record; case-type categories, statute decoding and all aggregate figures are derived by Docket Nexus (methodology).