Fdic v. Bernstein
Fdic v. Bernstein is a federal banking / commerce lawsuit filed on 06/22/1989 in the District Court, E.D. New York. The case was terminated on 09/19/1997.
A lawsuit records allegations and procedural activity. Being named as a party does not establish liability, wrongdoing, or the merits of any claim.
- Court
- District Court, E.D. New York (E.D.N.Y)
Official Court Website → - Assigned judge
- Jacob Mishler · 1,216 cases in index
- Docket number
- 9:89-cv-02080
- Nature of suit
- 430 Banks and banking
Disputes involving federally-regulated banks and banking activity. - Jurisdiction
- Government plaintiff
- Date filed
- 06/22/1989
- Date terminated
- 09/19/1997
777 Banking / Commerce cases in this court are indexed here.
About Banking / Commerce Lawsuits
These cases involve banking, financial institutions, and interstate commerce regulation, including disputes over loans, deposits, and federally regulated commercial activity.
Frequently Asked Questions
What is Fdic v. Bernstein?
Fdic v. Bernstein is a federal banking / commerce lawsuit filed on 06/22/1989 in the District Court, E.D. New York. The case was terminated on 09/19/1997. These cases involve banking, financial institutions, and interstate commerce regulation, including disputes over loans, deposits, and federally regulated commercial activity.
What type of case is this?
It is classified as “Banking / Commerce” under the federal nature-of-suit system. These cases involve banking, financial institutions, and interstate commerce regulation, including disputes over loans, deposits, and federally regulated commercial activity.
What court is the case in?
The case is in the District Court, E.D. New York, docket number 9:89-cv-02080.
When was the case filed?
Fdic v. Bernstein was filed on 06/22/1989. It was terminated on 09/19/1997.
Other Cases Involving These Parties
Related Banking / Commerce Cases
Source: public U.S. federal court record — docket 10309684 in the CourtListener/RECAP archive (verify this docket), court docket number 9:89-cv-02080 on PACER. Court, party, date and judge fields are reproduced from that record; case-type categories, statute decoding and all aggregate figures are derived by Docket Nexus (methodology).