Fdic v. Grove
Fdic v. Grove is a federal personal property / fraud lawsuit filed on 05/11/1988 in the District Court, C.D. Illinois. The case was terminated on 10/22/1993.
A lawsuit records allegations and procedural activity. Being named as a party does not establish liability, wrongdoing, or the merits of any claim.
- Court
- District Court, C.D. Illinois (C.D. Ill.)
Official Court Website → - Assigned judge
- Michael M. Mihm · 2,633 cases in index
- Docket number
- 1:88-cv-01140
- Nature of suit
- 380 Other personal property damage
Damage to or loss of personal property. - Jurisdiction
- Government plaintiff
- Date filed
- 05/11/1988
- Date terminated
- 10/22/1993
492 Personal Property / Fraud cases in this court are indexed here.
About Personal Property / Fraud Lawsuits
These cases involve damage to or loss of personal property, or claims of fraud and misrepresentation — including truth-in-lending and other deception-based claims.
Frequently Asked Questions
What is Fdic v. Grove?
Fdic v. Grove is a federal personal property / fraud lawsuit filed on 05/11/1988 in the District Court, C.D. Illinois. The case was terminated on 10/22/1993. These cases involve damage to or loss of personal property, or claims of fraud and misrepresentation — including truth-in-lending and other deception-based claims.
What type of case is this?
It is classified as “Personal Property / Fraud” under the federal nature-of-suit system. These cases involve damage to or loss of personal property, or claims of fraud and misrepresentation — including truth-in-lending and other deception-based claims.
What court is the case in?
The case is in the District Court, C.D. Illinois, docket number 1:88-cv-01140.
When was the case filed?
Fdic v. Grove was filed on 05/11/1988. It was terminated on 10/22/1993.
Other Cases Involving These Parties
Related Personal Property / Fraud Cases
Source: public U.S. federal court record — docket 9428540 in the CourtListener/RECAP archive (verify this docket), court docket number 1:88-cv-01140 on PACER. Court, party, date and judge fields are reproduced from that record; case-type categories, statute decoding and all aggregate figures are derived by Docket Nexus (methodology).