Fdic v. Mayberry
Fdic v. Mayberry is a federal banking / commerce lawsuit filed on 08/30/1991 in the District Court, N.D. Oklahoma. The case was terminated on 07/12/1994.
A lawsuit records allegations and procedural activity. Being named as a party does not establish liability, wrongdoing, or the merits of any claim.
- Court
- District Court, N.D. Oklahoma (N.D. Okla.)
Official Court Website → - Assigned judge
- Thomas R Brett · 1,188 cases in index
- Docket number
- 4:91-cv-00679
- Nature of suit
- 430 Banks and banking
Disputes involving federally-regulated banks and banking activity. - Jurisdiction
- Government plaintiff
- Date filed
- 08/30/1991
- Date terminated
- 07/12/1994
120 Banking / Commerce cases in this court are indexed here.
About Banking / Commerce Lawsuits
These cases involve banking, financial institutions, and interstate commerce regulation, including disputes over loans, deposits, and federally regulated commercial activity.
Frequently Asked Questions
What is Fdic v. Mayberry?
Fdic v. Mayberry is a federal banking / commerce lawsuit filed on 08/30/1991 in the District Court, N.D. Oklahoma. The case was terminated on 07/12/1994. These cases involve banking, financial institutions, and interstate commerce regulation, including disputes over loans, deposits, and federally regulated commercial activity.
What type of case is this?
It is classified as “Banking / Commerce” under the federal nature-of-suit system. These cases involve banking, financial institutions, and interstate commerce regulation, including disputes over loans, deposits, and federally regulated commercial activity.
What court is the case in?
The case is in the District Court, N.D. Oklahoma, docket number 4:91-cv-00679.
When was the case filed?
Fdic v. Mayberry was filed on 08/30/1991. It was terminated on 07/12/1994.
Other Cases Involving These Parties
Related Banking / Commerce Cases
Source: public U.S. federal court record — docket 9874887 in the CourtListener/RECAP archive (verify this docket), court docket number 4:91-cv-00679 on PACER. Court, party, date and judge fields are reproduced from that record; case-type categories, statute decoding and all aggregate figures are derived by Docket Nexus (methodology).