Federman v. Artzt

Court

District Court, E.D. New York (E.D.N.Y)
Official Court Website →

Assigned judge

Thomas C. Platt · 4,059 cases in index

Docket number

2:03-cv-04199

Cause

28:1332 Diversity-Breach of Fiduciary Duty
28 U.S.C. § 1332 — Diversity jurisdiction

Nature of suit

190 Contract: Other
General breach-of-contract disputes not covered by a more specific category.

Jurisdiction

Diversity

Jury demand

Plaintiff

Date filed

08/25/2003

Date terminated

12/08/2003

21,738 Contract cases in this court are indexed here.

Parties

• plaintiff · Federman · 29 cases
• defendant · Artzt · 4 cases

About Contract Lawsuits

Contract lawsuits involve disputes over an agreement between parties — claims that one side failed to perform, breached a term, or owes money under a contract. Common examples include unpaid invoices, broken business deals, and warranty or insurance disputes.

Frequently Asked Questions

What is Federman v. Artzt?

Federman v. Artzt is a federal contract lawsuit filed on 08/25/2003 in the District Court, E.D. New York. The case was terminated on 12/08/2003. Contract lawsuits involve disputes over an agreement between parties — claims that one side failed to perform, breached a term, or owes money under a contract. Common examples include unpaid invoices, broken business deals, and warranty or insurance disputes.

What type of case is this?

It is classified as “Contract” under the federal nature-of-suit system. Contract lawsuits involve disputes over an agreement between parties — claims that one side failed to perform, breached a term, or owes money under a contract. Common examples include unpaid invoices, broken business deals, and warranty or insurance disputes.

What court is the case in?

The case is in the District Court, E.D. New York, docket number 2:03-cv-04199.

When was the case filed?

Federman v. Artzt was filed on 08/25/2003. It was terminated on 12/08/2003.

What law is the case brought under?

The docket lists the cause as 28 U.S.C. § 1332 — Diversity jurisdiction.