Felices v. Boyd
Felices v. Boyd is a federal personal property / fraud lawsuit filed on 12/30/1997 in the District Court, M.D. Florida. The case was terminated on 04/17/1998.
A lawsuit records allegations and procedural activity. Being named as a party does not establish liability, wrongdoing, or the merits of any claim.
- Court
- District Court, M.D. Florida (M.D. Fla.)
Official Court Website → - Assigned judge
- Ralph W. Nimmons, Jr · 2,415 cases in index
- Docket number
- 3:97-cv-01491
- Nature of suit
- 370 Other fraud
Fraud or misrepresentation claims not covered by a more specific category. - Jurisdiction
- Diversity of citizenship
- Date filed
- 12/30/1997
- Date terminated
- 04/17/1998
2,335 Personal Property / Fraud cases in this court are indexed here.
About Personal Property / Fraud Lawsuits
These cases involve damage to or loss of personal property, or claims of fraud and misrepresentation — including truth-in-lending and other deception-based claims.
Frequently Asked Questions
What is Felices v. Boyd?
Felices v. Boyd is a federal personal property / fraud lawsuit filed on 12/30/1997 in the District Court, M.D. Florida. The case was terminated on 04/17/1998. These cases involve damage to or loss of personal property, or claims of fraud and misrepresentation — including truth-in-lending and other deception-based claims.
What type of case is this?
It is classified as “Personal Property / Fraud” under the federal nature-of-suit system. These cases involve damage to or loss of personal property, or claims of fraud and misrepresentation — including truth-in-lending and other deception-based claims.
What court is the case in?
The case is in the District Court, M.D. Florida, docket number 3:97-cv-01491.
When was the case filed?
Felices v. Boyd was filed on 12/30/1997. It was terminated on 04/17/1998.
Related Personal Property / Fraud Cases
Source: public U.S. federal court record — docket 13763994 in the CourtListener/RECAP archive (verify this docket), court docket number 3:97-cv-01491 on PACER. Court, party, date and judge fields are reproduced from that record; case-type categories, statute decoding and all aggregate figures are derived by Docket Nexus (methodology).