Fellowes, Inc v. Mn Mining
Fellowes, Inc v. Mn Mining is a federal patent lawsuit filed on 03/17/2004 in the District Court, D. Minnesota. The case was terminated on 05/14/2004.
A lawsuit records allegations and procedural activity. Being named as a party does not establish liability, wrongdoing, or the merits of any claim.
- Court
- District Court, D. Minnesota (D. Minnesota)
Official Court Website → - Docket number
- —
- Nature of suit
- 830 Patent
Infringement of a patented invention. - Jurisdiction
- Federal question
- Date filed
- 03/17/2004
- Date terminated
- 05/14/2004
1,596 Patent cases in this court are indexed here.
Parties
- plaintiff · Fellowes, Inc · 28 cases
- defendant · Mn Mining · 3 cases
About Patent Lawsuits
Patent lawsuits allege infringement of a patented invention — that another party made, used, or sold a protected technology without authorization. These cases are common in technology and pharmaceutical industries.
Frequently Asked Questions
What is Fellowes, Inc v. Mn Mining?
Fellowes, Inc v. Mn Mining is a federal patent lawsuit filed on 03/17/2004 in the District Court, D. Minnesota. The case was terminated on 05/14/2004. Patent lawsuits allege infringement of a patented invention — that another party made, used, or sold a protected technology without authorization. These cases are common in technology and pharmaceutical industries.
What type of case is this?
It is classified as “Patent” under the federal nature-of-suit system. Patent lawsuits allege infringement of a patented invention — that another party made, used, or sold a protected technology without authorization. These cases are common in technology and pharmaceutical industries.
What court is the case in?
The case is in the District Court, D. Minnesota.
When was the case filed?
Fellowes, Inc v. Mn Mining was filed on 03/17/2004. It was terminated on 05/14/2004.
Other Cases Involving These Parties
Related Patent Cases
Source: public U.S. federal court record — docket 11823821 in the CourtListener/RECAP archive (verify this docket). Court, party, date and judge fields are reproduced from that record; case-type categories, statute decoding and all aggregate figures are derived by Docket Nexus (methodology).