Fha v. Wilson
Fha v. Wilson is a federal real property lawsuit filed on 05/20/1996 in the District Court, D. Montana. The case was terminated on 12/23/1998.
A lawsuit records allegations and procedural activity. Being named as a party does not establish liability, wrongdoing, or the merits of any claim.
- Court
- District Court, D. Montana (D. Mont.)
Official Court Website → - Assigned judge
- Charles C. Lovell · 731 cases in index
- Docket number
- 6:96-cv-00030
- Nature of suit
- 240 Torts to land
Claims for damage to or trespass upon real property. - Jurisdiction
- Diversity of citizenship
- Date filed
- 05/20/1996
- Date terminated
- 12/23/1998
741 Real Property cases in this court are indexed here.
About Real Property Lawsuits
Real property cases involve disputes over land or buildings, such as foreclosures, title and ownership disputes, condemnation, and landlord-tenant matters litigated in federal court.
Frequently Asked Questions
What is Fha v. Wilson?
Fha v. Wilson is a federal real property lawsuit filed on 05/20/1996 in the District Court, D. Montana. The case was terminated on 12/23/1998. Real property cases involve disputes over land or buildings, such as foreclosures, title and ownership disputes, condemnation, and landlord-tenant matters litigated in federal court.
What type of case is this?
It is classified as “Real Property” under the federal nature-of-suit system. Real property cases involve disputes over land or buildings, such as foreclosures, title and ownership disputes, condemnation, and landlord-tenant matters litigated in federal court.
What court is the case in?
The case is in the District Court, D. Montana, docket number 6:96-cv-00030.
When was the case filed?
Fha v. Wilson was filed on 05/20/1996. It was terminated on 12/23/1998.
Other Cases Involving These Parties
Related Real Property Cases
Source: public U.S. federal court record — docket 10451187 in the CourtListener/RECAP archive (verify this docket), court docket number 6:96-cv-00030 on PACER. Court, party, date and judge fields are reproduced from that record; case-type categories, statute decoding and all aggregate figures are derived by Docket Nexus (methodology).