Fidelity & Deposit v. Fdic
Fidelity & Deposit v. Fdic is a federal personal property / fraud lawsuit filed on 06/05/1992 in the District Court, W.D. Texas. The case was terminated on 12/14/1992.
A lawsuit records allegations and procedural activity. Being named as a party does not establish liability, wrongdoing, or the merits of any claim.
- Court
- District Court, W.D. Texas (W.D. Tex.)
Official Court Website → - Docket number
- —
- Nature of suit
- 370 Other fraud
Fraud or misrepresentation claims not covered by a more specific category. - Jurisdiction
- Government plaintiff
- Date filed
- 06/05/1992
- Date terminated
- 12/14/1992
1,205 Personal Property / Fraud cases in this court are indexed here.
Parties
- plaintiff · Fidelity & Deposit · 451 cases
- defendant · Fdic · 5388 cases
About Personal Property / Fraud Lawsuits
These cases involve damage to or loss of personal property, or claims of fraud and misrepresentation — including truth-in-lending and other deception-based claims.
Frequently Asked Questions
What is Fidelity & Deposit v. Fdic?
Fidelity & Deposit v. Fdic is a federal personal property / fraud lawsuit filed on 06/05/1992 in the District Court, W.D. Texas. The case was terminated on 12/14/1992. These cases involve damage to or loss of personal property, or claims of fraud and misrepresentation — including truth-in-lending and other deception-based claims.
What type of case is this?
It is classified as “Personal Property / Fraud” under the federal nature-of-suit system. These cases involve damage to or loss of personal property, or claims of fraud and misrepresentation — including truth-in-lending and other deception-based claims.
What court is the case in?
The case is in the District Court, W.D. Texas.
When was the case filed?
Fidelity & Deposit v. Fdic was filed on 06/05/1992. It was terminated on 12/14/1992.
Other Cases Involving These Parties
Related Personal Property / Fraud Cases
Source: public U.S. federal court record — docket 62714888 in the CourtListener/RECAP archive (verify this docket). Court, party, date and judge fields are reproduced from that record; case-type categories, statute decoding and all aggregate figures are derived by Docket Nexus (methodology).