Finale v. Natoli
Finale v. Natoli is a federal personal property / fraud lawsuit filed on 05/31/2005 in the District Court, S.D. New York. The case was terminated on 06/09/2005.
A lawsuit records allegations and procedural activity. Being named as a party does not establish liability, wrongdoing, or the merits of any claim.
- Court
- District Court, S.D. New York (S.D.N.Y.)
Official Court Website → - Assigned judge
- Victor Marrero · 3,059 cases in index
- Docket number
- 1:05-cv-05145
- Nature of suit
- 380 Other personal property damage
Damage to or loss of personal property. - Jurisdiction
- Federal question
- Date filed
- 05/31/2005
- Date terminated
- 06/09/2005
6,326 Personal Property / Fraud cases in this court are indexed here.
About Personal Property / Fraud Lawsuits
These cases involve damage to or loss of personal property, or claims of fraud and misrepresentation — including truth-in-lending and other deception-based claims.
Frequently Asked Questions
What is Finale v. Natoli?
Finale v. Natoli is a federal personal property / fraud lawsuit filed on 05/31/2005 in the District Court, S.D. New York. The case was terminated on 06/09/2005. These cases involve damage to or loss of personal property, or claims of fraud and misrepresentation — including truth-in-lending and other deception-based claims.
What type of case is this?
It is classified as “Personal Property / Fraud” under the federal nature-of-suit system. These cases involve damage to or loss of personal property, or claims of fraud and misrepresentation — including truth-in-lending and other deception-based claims.
What court is the case in?
The case is in the District Court, S.D. New York, docket number 1:05-cv-05145.
When was the case filed?
Finale v. Natoli was filed on 05/31/2005. It was terminated on 06/09/2005.
Other Cases Involving These Parties
Related Personal Property / Fraud Cases
Source: public U.S. federal court record — docket 11910886 in the CourtListener/RECAP archive (verify this docket), court docket number 1:05-cv-05145 on PACER. Court, party, date and judge fields are reproduced from that record; case-type categories, statute decoding and all aggregate figures are derived by Docket Nexus (methodology).