Docket Nexus — Federal court records.
Copyright Lawsuit

Fleischer Studios v. Playboy, Et Al

Copyright Terminated 03/19/1991 District Court, C.D. California

Fleischer Studios v. Playboy, Et Al is a federal copyright lawsuit filed on 04/09/1990 in the District Court, C.D. California. The case was terminated on 03/19/1991.

A lawsuit records allegations and procedural activity. Being named as a party does not establish liability, wrongdoing, or the merits of any claim.

Court
District Court, C.D. California (C.D. Cal.)
Official Court Website →
Docket number
Nature of suit
820 Copyright
Infringement of copyrighted works.
Jurisdiction
Federal question
Date filed
04/09/1990
Date terminated
03/19/1991

14,875 Copyright cases in this court are indexed here.

Parties

About Copyright Lawsuits

Copyright lawsuits allege unauthorized use, copying, or distribution of creative works protected under the Copyright Act — including software, music, film, writing, and images.

Frequently Asked Questions

What is Fleischer Studios v. Playboy, Et Al?

Fleischer Studios v. Playboy, Et Al is a federal copyright lawsuit filed on 04/09/1990 in the District Court, C.D. California. The case was terminated on 03/19/1991. Copyright lawsuits allege unauthorized use, copying, or distribution of creative works protected under the Copyright Act — including software, music, film, writing, and images.

What type of case is this?

It is classified as “Copyright” under the federal nature-of-suit system. Copyright lawsuits allege unauthorized use, copying, or distribution of creative works protected under the Copyright Act — including software, music, film, writing, and images.

What court is the case in?

The case is in the District Court, C.D. California.

When was the case filed?

Fleischer Studios v. Playboy, Et Al was filed on 04/09/1990. It was terminated on 03/19/1991.

Other Cases Involving These Parties

Related Copyright Cases

Source: public U.S. federal court record — docket 9241122 in the CourtListener/RECAP archive (verify this docket). Court, party, date and judge fields are reproduced from that record; case-type categories, statute decoding and all aggregate figures are derived by Docket Nexus (methodology).