Floss v. Sba
Floss v. Sba is a federal personal property / fraud lawsuit filed on 03/04/1994 in the District Court, S.D. Iowa. The case was terminated on 04/05/1994.
A lawsuit records allegations and procedural activity. Being named as a party does not establish liability, wrongdoing, or the merits of any claim.
- Court
- District Court, S.D. Iowa (S.D. Iowa)
Official Court Website → - Assigned judge
- Ronald E. Longstaff · 1,868 cases in index
- Docket number
- 4:94-cv-10146
- Nature of suit
- 370 Other fraud
Fraud or misrepresentation claims not covered by a more specific category. - Jurisdiction
- Government defendant
- Date filed
- 03/04/1994
- Date terminated
- 04/05/1994
510 Personal Property / Fraud cases in this court are indexed here.
About Personal Property / Fraud Lawsuits
These cases involve damage to or loss of personal property, or claims of fraud and misrepresentation — including truth-in-lending and other deception-based claims.
Frequently Asked Questions
What is Floss v. Sba?
Floss v. Sba is a federal personal property / fraud lawsuit filed on 03/04/1994 in the District Court, S.D. Iowa. The case was terminated on 04/05/1994. These cases involve damage to or loss of personal property, or claims of fraud and misrepresentation — including truth-in-lending and other deception-based claims.
What type of case is this?
It is classified as “Personal Property / Fraud” under the federal nature-of-suit system. These cases involve damage to or loss of personal property, or claims of fraud and misrepresentation — including truth-in-lending and other deception-based claims.
What court is the case in?
The case is in the District Court, S.D. Iowa, docket number 4:94-cv-10146.
When was the case filed?
Floss v. Sba was filed on 03/04/1994. It was terminated on 04/05/1994.
Other Cases Involving These Parties
Related Personal Property / Fraud Cases
Source: public U.S. federal court record — docket 9830654 in the CourtListener/RECAP archive (verify this docket), court docket number 4:94-cv-10146 on PACER. Court, party, date and judge fields are reproduced from that record; case-type categories, statute decoding and all aggregate figures are derived by Docket Nexus (methodology).