Forlander v. I R S
Forlander v. I R S is a federal tax / statutory actions lawsuit filed on 08/25/1988 in the District Court, W.D. Louisiana. The case was terminated on 12/09/1988.
A lawsuit records allegations and procedural activity. Being named as a party does not establish liability, wrongdoing, or the merits of any claim.
- Court
- District Court, W.D. Louisiana (W.D. La.)
Official Court Website → - Assigned judge
- John M. Shaw
- Docket number
- 4:88-cv-02165
- Nature of suit
- 870 Tax suits
Federal tax disputes with the United States as a party. - Jurisdiction
- Government defendant
- Date filed
- 08/25/1988
- Date terminated
- 12/09/1988
1,801 Federal Tax / Statutory Actions cases in this court are indexed here.
About Federal Tax / Statutory Actions Lawsuits
This group covers federal tax disputes and other statutory actions, including IRS-related suits and claims arising under various federal regulatory statutes.
Frequently Asked Questions
What is Forlander v. I R S?
Forlander v. I R S is a federal tax / statutory actions lawsuit filed on 08/25/1988 in the District Court, W.D. Louisiana. The case was terminated on 12/09/1988. This group covers federal tax disputes and other statutory actions, including IRS-related suits and claims arising under various federal regulatory statutes.
What type of case is this?
It is classified as “Federal Tax / Statutory Actions” under the federal nature-of-suit system. This group covers federal tax disputes and other statutory actions, including IRS-related suits and claims arising under various federal regulatory statutes.
What court is the case in?
The case is in the District Court, W.D. Louisiana, docket number 4:88-cv-02165.
When was the case filed?
Forlander v. I R S was filed on 08/25/1988. It was terminated on 12/09/1988.
Other Cases Involving These Parties
Related Federal Tax / Statutory Actions Cases
Source: public U.S. federal court record — docket 8810220 in the CourtListener/RECAP archive (verify this docket), court docket number 4:88-cv-02165 on PACER. Court, party, date and judge fields are reproduced from that record; case-type categories, statute decoding and all aggregate figures are derived by Docket Nexus (methodology).