Fox v. Chater
Fox v. Chater is a federal personal property / fraud lawsuit filed on 08/20/1996 in the District Court, W.D. Kentucky. The case was terminated on 04/04/1997.
A lawsuit records allegations and procedural activity. Being named as a party does not establish liability, wrongdoing, or the merits of any claim.
- Court
- District Court, W.D. Kentucky (W.D. Ky.)
Official Court Website → - Assigned judge
- Joseph H. McKinley, Jr · 2,833 cases in index
- Docket number
- 4:96-cv-00125
- Nature of suit
- 380 Other personal property damage
Damage to or loss of personal property. - Jurisdiction
- Diversity of citizenship
- Date filed
- 08/20/1996
- Date terminated
- 04/04/1997
584 Personal Property / Fraud cases in this court are indexed here.
About Personal Property / Fraud Lawsuits
These cases involve damage to or loss of personal property, or claims of fraud and misrepresentation — including truth-in-lending and other deception-based claims.
Frequently Asked Questions
What is Fox v. Chater?
Fox v. Chater is a federal personal property / fraud lawsuit filed on 08/20/1996 in the District Court, W.D. Kentucky. The case was terminated on 04/04/1997. These cases involve damage to or loss of personal property, or claims of fraud and misrepresentation — including truth-in-lending and other deception-based claims.
What type of case is this?
It is classified as “Personal Property / Fraud” under the federal nature-of-suit system. These cases involve damage to or loss of personal property, or claims of fraud and misrepresentation — including truth-in-lending and other deception-based claims.
What court is the case in?
The case is in the District Court, W.D. Kentucky, docket number 4:96-cv-00125.
When was the case filed?
Fox v. Chater was filed on 08/20/1996. It was terminated on 04/04/1997.
Other Cases Involving These Parties
Related Personal Property / Fraud Cases
Source: public U.S. federal court record — docket 17616767 in the CourtListener/RECAP archive (verify this docket), court docket number 4:96-cv-00125 on PACER. Court, party, date and judge fields are reproduced from that record; case-type categories, statute decoding and all aggregate figures are derived by Docket Nexus (methodology).