Foxworth v. Sanford Surrounded, LLC

Court

District Court, M.D. North Carolina (M.D.N.C.)
Official Court Website →

Assigned judge

Lindsey A. Freeman · 7 cases in index

Docket number

1:24-cv-00818

Cause

47:0227 Telephone Consumer Protection Act
47 U.S.C. § 227 — Telephone Consumer Protection Act

Nature of suit

890 Other Statutory Actions
Federal statutory claims not covered by a more specific category.

Jurisdiction

Federal Question

Jury demand

Both

Date filed

09/29/2024

1,087 Federal Tax / Statutory Actions cases in this court are indexed here.

Parties

• plaintiff · Foxworth · 99 cases
• defendant · Sanford Surrounded, LLC

Part of a Larger Litigation Pattern

This is one of 2 Federal Tax / Statutory Actions cases in our index naming SANFORD SURROUNDED, LLC — a possible mass-tort or coordinated-litigation cluster.

About Federal Tax / Statutory Actions Lawsuits

This group covers federal tax disputes and other statutory actions, including IRS-related suits and claims arising under various federal regulatory statutes.

Frequently Asked Questions

What is Foxworth v. Sanford Surrounded, LLC?

Foxworth v. Sanford Surrounded, LLC is a federal federal tax / statutory actions lawsuit filed on 09/29/2024 in the District Court, M.D. North Carolina. The case is currently open in the federal court system. This group covers federal tax disputes and other statutory actions, including IRS-related suits and claims arising under various federal regulatory statutes.

What type of case is this?

It is classified as “Federal Tax / Statutory Actions” under the federal nature-of-suit system. This group covers federal tax disputes and other statutory actions, including IRS-related suits and claims arising under various federal regulatory statutes.

What court is the case in?

The case is in the District Court, M.D. North Carolina, docket number 1:24-cv-00818.

When was the case filed?

Foxworth v. Sanford Surrounded, LLC was filed on 09/29/2024. The case is currently open.

What law is the case brought under?

The docket lists the cause as 47 U.S.C. § 227 — Telephone Consumer Protection Act.