Fraige v. Hydrofoam
Fraige v. Hydrofoam is a federal patent lawsuit filed on 05/03/1988 in the District Court, W.D. Washington. The case was terminated on 05/01/1989.
A lawsuit records allegations and procedural activity. Being named as a party does not establish liability, wrongdoing, or the merits of any claim.
- Court
- District Court, W.D. Washington (W.D. Wash.)
Official Court Website → - Assigned judge
- Jack E. Tanner · 433 cases in index
- Docket number
- 3:88-cv-00202
- Nature of suit
- 830 Patent
Infringement of a patented invention. - Jurisdiction
- Federal question
- Date filed
- 05/03/1988
- Date terminated
- 05/01/1989
1,168 Patent cases in this court are indexed here.
About Patent Lawsuits
Patent lawsuits allege infringement of a patented invention — that another party made, used, or sold a protected technology without authorization. These cases are common in technology and pharmaceutical industries.
Frequently Asked Questions
What is Fraige v. Hydrofoam?
Fraige v. Hydrofoam is a federal patent lawsuit filed on 05/03/1988 in the District Court, W.D. Washington. The case was terminated on 05/01/1989. Patent lawsuits allege infringement of a patented invention — that another party made, used, or sold a protected technology without authorization. These cases are common in technology and pharmaceutical industries.
What type of case is this?
It is classified as “Patent” under the federal nature-of-suit system. Patent lawsuits allege infringement of a patented invention — that another party made, used, or sold a protected technology without authorization. These cases are common in technology and pharmaceutical industries.
What court is the case in?
The case is in the District Court, W.D. Washington, docket number 3:88-cv-00202.
When was the case filed?
Fraige v. Hydrofoam was filed on 05/03/1988. It was terminated on 05/01/1989.
Other Cases Involving These Parties
Related Patent Cases
Source: public U.S. federal court record — docket 8703678 in the CourtListener/RECAP archive (verify this docket), court docket number 3:88-cv-00202 on PACER. Court, party, date and judge fields are reproduced from that record; case-type categories, statute decoding and all aggregate figures are derived by Docket Nexus (methodology).