Franch v. Pan Am Express
Franch v. Pan Am Express is a federal tax / statutory actions lawsuit filed on 10/07/1987 in the District Court, D. Rhode Island. The case was terminated on 04/18/1988.
A lawsuit records allegations and procedural activity. Being named as a party does not establish liability, wrongdoing, or the merits of any claim.
- Court
- District Court, D. Rhode Island (D.R.I.)
Official Court Website → - Docket number
- —
- Nature of suit
- 890 Other statutory actions
Federal statutory claims not covered by a more specific category. - Jurisdiction
- Federal question
- Date filed
- 10/07/1987
- Date terminated
- 04/18/1988
1,126 Federal Tax / Statutory Actions cases in this court are indexed here.
Parties
- plaintiff · Franch · 5 cases
- defendant · Pan Am Express · 2 cases
About Federal Tax / Statutory Actions Lawsuits
This group covers federal tax disputes and other statutory actions, including IRS-related suits and claims arising under various federal regulatory statutes.
Frequently Asked Questions
What is Franch v. Pan Am Express?
Franch v. Pan Am Express is a federal tax / statutory actions lawsuit filed on 10/07/1987 in the District Court, D. Rhode Island. The case was terminated on 04/18/1988. This group covers federal tax disputes and other statutory actions, including IRS-related suits and claims arising under various federal regulatory statutes.
What type of case is this?
It is classified as “Federal Tax / Statutory Actions” under the federal nature-of-suit system. This group covers federal tax disputes and other statutory actions, including IRS-related suits and claims arising under various federal regulatory statutes.
What court is the case in?
The case is in the District Court, D. Rhode Island.
When was the case filed?
Franch v. Pan Am Express was filed on 10/07/1987. It was terminated on 04/18/1988.
Other Cases Involving These Parties
Related Federal Tax / Statutory Actions Cases
Source: public U.S. federal court record — docket 8524376 in the CourtListener/RECAP archive (verify this docket). Court, party, date and judge fields are reproduced from that record; case-type categories, statute decoding and all aggregate figures are derived by Docket Nexus (methodology).