Franzese v. Eichholz
Franzese v. Eichholz is a federal copyright lawsuit filed on 08/06/2009 in the District Court, S.D. Georgia. The case was terminated on 01/03/2011.
A lawsuit records allegations and procedural activity. Being named as a party does not establish liability, wrongdoing, or the merits of any claim.
- Court
- District Court, S.D. Georgia (S.D. Ga.)
Official Court Website → - Assigned judge
- William T. Moore, Jr · 1,315 cases in index
- Docket number
- 4:09-cv-00124
- Nature of suit
- 820 Copyright
Infringement of copyrighted works. - Jurisdiction
- Federal question
- Date filed
- 08/06/2009
- Date terminated
- 01/03/2011
97 Copyright cases in this court are indexed here.
About Copyright Lawsuits
Copyright lawsuits allege unauthorized use, copying, or distribution of creative works protected under the Copyright Act — including software, music, film, writing, and images.
Frequently Asked Questions
What is Franzese v. Eichholz?
Franzese v. Eichholz is a federal copyright lawsuit filed on 08/06/2009 in the District Court, S.D. Georgia. The case was terminated on 01/03/2011. Copyright lawsuits allege unauthorized use, copying, or distribution of creative works protected under the Copyright Act — including software, music, film, writing, and images.
What type of case is this?
It is classified as “Copyright” under the federal nature-of-suit system. Copyright lawsuits allege unauthorized use, copying, or distribution of creative works protected under the Copyright Act — including software, music, film, writing, and images.
What court is the case in?
The case is in the District Court, S.D. Georgia, docket number 4:09-cv-00124.
When was the case filed?
Franzese v. Eichholz was filed on 08/06/2009. It was terminated on 01/03/2011.
Other Cases Involving These Parties
Related Copyright Cases
Source: public U.S. federal court record — docket 12696180 in the CourtListener/RECAP archive (verify this docket), court docket number 4:09-cv-00124 on PACER. Court, party, date and judge fields are reproduced from that record; case-type categories, statute decoding and all aggregate figures are derived by Docket Nexus (methodology).