Frobish v. Army
Frobish v. Army is a federal tax / statutory actions lawsuit filed on 11/28/1990 in the District Court, D. Kansas. The case was terminated on 05/02/1991.
A lawsuit records allegations and procedural activity. Being named as a party does not establish liability, wrongdoing, or the merits of any claim.
- Court
- District Court, D. Kansas (D. Kan.)
Official Court Website → - Assigned judge
- Dale E. Saffels · 654 cases in index
- Docket number
- 5:90-cv-04212
- Nature of suit
- 890 Other statutory actions
Federal statutory claims not covered by a more specific category. - Jurisdiction
- Government defendant
- Date filed
- 11/28/1990
- Date terminated
- 05/02/1991
1,996 Federal Tax / Statutory Actions cases in this court are indexed here.
About Federal Tax / Statutory Actions Lawsuits
This group covers federal tax disputes and other statutory actions, including IRS-related suits and claims arising under various federal regulatory statutes.
Frequently Asked Questions
What is Frobish v. Army?
Frobish v. Army is a federal tax / statutory actions lawsuit filed on 11/28/1990 in the District Court, D. Kansas. The case was terminated on 05/02/1991. This group covers federal tax disputes and other statutory actions, including IRS-related suits and claims arising under various federal regulatory statutes.
What type of case is this?
It is classified as “Federal Tax / Statutory Actions” under the federal nature-of-suit system. This group covers federal tax disputes and other statutory actions, including IRS-related suits and claims arising under various federal regulatory statutes.
What court is the case in?
The case is in the District Court, D. Kansas, docket number 5:90-cv-04212.
When was the case filed?
Frobish v. Army was filed on 11/28/1990. It was terminated on 05/02/1991.
Other Cases Involving These Parties
Related Federal Tax / Statutory Actions Cases
Source: public U.S. federal court record — docket 9259106 in the CourtListener/RECAP archive (verify this docket), court docket number 5:90-cv-04212 on PACER. Court, party, date and judge fields are reproduced from that record; case-type categories, statute decoding and all aggregate figures are derived by Docket Nexus (methodology).