Gala v. Frank Etal
Gala v. Frank Etal is a federal labor lawsuit filed on 04/27/1988 in the District Court, W.D. New York. The case was terminated on 01/27/1989.
A lawsuit records allegations and procedural activity. Being named as a party does not establish liability, wrongdoing, or the merits of any claim.
- Court
- District Court, W.D. New York (W.D.N.Y.)
Official Court Website → - Docket number
- —
- Nature of suit
- 790 Other labor litigation
Labor disputes not covered by a more specific category. - Jurisdiction
- Government defendant
- Date filed
- 04/27/1988
- Date terminated
- 01/27/1989
2,824 Labor cases in this court are indexed here.
Parties
- plaintiff · Gala · 19 cases
- defendant · Frank Etal · 10 cases
About Labor Lawsuits
Labor lawsuits involve the employment relationship — unpaid wages and overtime under the Fair Labor Standards Act, union and collective-bargaining disputes, employee benefits under ERISA, and family and medical leave claims.
Frequently Asked Questions
What is Gala v. Frank Etal?
Gala v. Frank Etal is a federal labor lawsuit filed on 04/27/1988 in the District Court, W.D. New York. The case was terminated on 01/27/1989. Labor lawsuits involve the employment relationship — unpaid wages and overtime under the Fair Labor Standards Act, union and collective-bargaining disputes, employee benefits under ERISA, and family and medical leave claims.
What type of case is this?
It is classified as “Labor” under the federal nature-of-suit system. Labor lawsuits involve the employment relationship — unpaid wages and overtime under the Fair Labor Standards Act, union and collective-bargaining disputes, employee benefits under ERISA, and family and medical leave claims.
What court is the case in?
The case is in the District Court, W.D. New York.
When was the case filed?
Gala v. Frank Etal was filed on 04/27/1988. It was terminated on 01/27/1989.
Other Cases Involving These Parties
Related Labor Cases
Source: public U.S. federal court record — docket 8764447 in the CourtListener/RECAP archive (verify this docket). Court, party, date and judge fields are reproduced from that record; case-type categories, statute decoding and all aggregate figures are derived by Docket Nexus (methodology).