Gapa v. Laho
Gapa v. Laho is a federal personal property / fraud lawsuit filed on 11/03/1999 in the District Court, E.D. Michigan. The case was terminated on 02/22/2002.
A lawsuit records allegations and procedural activity. Being named as a party does not establish liability, wrongdoing, or the merits of any claim.
- Court
- District Court, E.D. Michigan (E.D. Mich.)
Official Court Website → - Assigned judge
- George Caram Steeh · 2,465 cases in index
- Docket number
- 2:99-cv-76367
- Nature of suit
- 380 Other personal property damage
Damage to or loss of personal property. - Jurisdiction
- Diversity of citizenship
- Date filed
- 11/03/1999
- Date terminated
- 02/22/2002
2,198 Personal Property / Fraud cases in this court are indexed here.
About Personal Property / Fraud Lawsuits
These cases involve damage to or loss of personal property, or claims of fraud and misrepresentation — including truth-in-lending and other deception-based claims.
Frequently Asked Questions
What is Gapa v. Laho?
Gapa v. Laho is a federal personal property / fraud lawsuit filed on 11/03/1999 in the District Court, E.D. Michigan. The case was terminated on 02/22/2002. These cases involve damage to or loss of personal property, or claims of fraud and misrepresentation — including truth-in-lending and other deception-based claims.
What type of case is this?
It is classified as “Personal Property / Fraud” under the federal nature-of-suit system. These cases involve damage to or loss of personal property, or claims of fraud and misrepresentation — including truth-in-lending and other deception-based claims.
What court is the case in?
The case is in the District Court, E.D. Michigan, docket number 2:99-cv-76367.
When was the case filed?
Gapa v. Laho was filed on 11/03/1999. It was terminated on 02/22/2002.
Other Cases Involving These Parties
Related Personal Property / Fraud Cases
Source: public U.S. federal court record — docket 11415089 in the CourtListener/RECAP archive (verify this docket), court docket number 2:99-cv-76367 on PACER. Court, party, date and judge fields are reproduced from that record; case-type categories, statute decoding and all aggregate figures are derived by Docket Nexus (methodology).