Garth v. Chapman
Garth v. Chapman is a federal personal property / fraud lawsuit filed on 07/22/2002 in the District Court, E.D. Arkansas. The case was terminated on 09/09/2002.
A lawsuit records allegations and procedural activity. Being named as a party does not establish liability, wrongdoing, or the merits of any claim.
- Court
- District Court, E.D. Arkansas (E.D. Ark.)
Official Court Website → - Assigned judge
- James M. Moody · 1,469 cases in index
- Docket number
- 5:02-cv-00261
- Nature of suit
- 380 Other personal property damage
Damage to or loss of personal property. - Jurisdiction
- Diversity of citizenship
- Date filed
- 07/22/2002
- Date terminated
- 09/09/2002
707 Personal Property / Fraud cases in this court are indexed here.
About Personal Property / Fraud Lawsuits
These cases involve damage to or loss of personal property, or claims of fraud and misrepresentation — including truth-in-lending and other deception-based claims.
Frequently Asked Questions
What is Garth v. Chapman?
Garth v. Chapman is a federal personal property / fraud lawsuit filed on 07/22/2002 in the District Court, E.D. Arkansas. The case was terminated on 09/09/2002. These cases involve damage to or loss of personal property, or claims of fraud and misrepresentation — including truth-in-lending and other deception-based claims.
What type of case is this?
It is classified as “Personal Property / Fraud” under the federal nature-of-suit system. These cases involve damage to or loss of personal property, or claims of fraud and misrepresentation — including truth-in-lending and other deception-based claims.
What court is the case in?
The case is in the District Court, E.D. Arkansas, docket number 5:02-cv-00261.
When was the case filed?
Garth v. Chapman was filed on 07/22/2002. It was terminated on 09/09/2002.
Other Cases Involving These Parties
Related Personal Property / Fraud Cases
Source: public U.S. federal court record — docket 14028432 in the CourtListener/RECAP archive (verify this docket), court docket number 5:02-cv-00261 on PACER. Court, party, date and judge fields are reproduced from that record; case-type categories, statute decoding and all aggregate figures are derived by Docket Nexus (methodology).