Geiger v. Flores Chavez Enterprises, LLC

Court

District Court, N.D. Georgia (N.D. Ga.)
Official Court Website →

Assigned judge

Sarah E. Geraghty · 623 cases in index

Docket number

1:26-cv-00020

Cause

28:1338 Trademark Infringement
28 U.S.C. § 1338 — Patent, copyright & trademark jurisdiction

Nature of suit

840 Trademark
Infringement or dilution of a trademark under the Lanham Act.

Jurisdiction

Federal Question

Jury demand

Plaintiff

Date filed

01/05/2026

2,578 Trademark cases in this court are indexed here.

Parties

• plaintiff · Geiger · 321 cases
• defendant · Flores Chavez Enterprises, LLC

Part of a Larger Litigation Pattern

This is one of 2 Trademark cases in our index naming Flores Chavez Enterprises, LLC — a possible mass-tort or coordinated-litigation cluster.

About Trademark Lawsuits

Trademark lawsuits allege infringement or dilution of a brand name, logo, or other mark under the Lanham Act — typically claims that one party's use is likely to confuse consumers about the source of goods or services.

Frequently Asked Questions

What is Geiger v. Flores Chavez Enterprises, LLC?

Geiger v. Flores Chavez Enterprises, LLC is a federal trademark lawsuit filed on 01/05/2026 in the District Court, N.D. Georgia. The case is currently open in the federal court system. Trademark lawsuits allege infringement or dilution of a brand name, logo, or other mark under the Lanham Act — typically claims that one party's use is likely to confuse consumers about the source of goods or services.

What type of case is this?

It is classified as “Trademark” under the federal nature-of-suit system. Trademark lawsuits allege infringement or dilution of a brand name, logo, or other mark under the Lanham Act — typically claims that one party's use is likely to confuse consumers about the source of goods or services.

What court is the case in?

The case is in the District Court, N.D. Georgia, docket number 1:26-cv-00020.

When was the case filed?

Geiger v. Flores Chavez Enterprises, LLC was filed on 01/05/2026. The case is currently open.

What law is the case brought under?

The docket lists the cause as 28 U.S.C. § 1338 — Patent, copyright & trademark jurisdiction.