Docket Nexus — Federal court records.
Copyright Lawsuit

Giger v. Danzig, Et Al

Copyright Terminated 04/29/1997 District Court, S.D. New York

Giger v. Danzig, Et Al is a federal copyright lawsuit filed on 10/26/1994 in the District Court, S.D. New York. The case was terminated on 04/29/1997.

A lawsuit records allegations and procedural activity. Being named as a party does not establish liability, wrongdoing, or the merits of any claim.

Court
District Court, S.D. New York (S.D.N.Y.)
Official Court Website →
Docket number
Nature of suit
820 Copyright
Infringement of copyrighted works.
Jurisdiction
Federal question
Date filed
10/26/1994
Date terminated
04/29/1997

12,066 Copyright cases in this court are indexed here.

Parties

  • plaintiff · Giger · 20 cases
  • defendant · Danzig · 145 cases

About Copyright Lawsuits

Copyright lawsuits allege unauthorized use, copying, or distribution of creative works protected under the Copyright Act — including software, music, film, writing, and images.

Frequently Asked Questions

What is Giger v. Danzig, Et Al?

Giger v. Danzig, Et Al is a federal copyright lawsuit filed on 10/26/1994 in the District Court, S.D. New York. The case was terminated on 04/29/1997. Copyright lawsuits allege unauthorized use, copying, or distribution of creative works protected under the Copyright Act — including software, music, film, writing, and images.

What type of case is this?

It is classified as “Copyright” under the federal nature-of-suit system. Copyright lawsuits allege unauthorized use, copying, or distribution of creative works protected under the Copyright Act — including software, music, film, writing, and images.

What court is the case in?

The case is in the District Court, S.D. New York.

When was the case filed?

Giger v. Danzig, Et Al was filed on 10/26/1994. It was terminated on 04/29/1997.

Other Cases Involving These Parties

Related Copyright Cases

Source: public U.S. federal court record — docket 13716543 in the CourtListener/RECAP archive (verify this docket). Court, party, date and judge fields are reproduced from that record; case-type categories, statute decoding and all aggregate figures are derived by Docket Nexus (methodology).