Gill v. Pinckard
Gill v. Pinckard is a federal patent lawsuit filed on 03/30/1993 in the District Court, N.D. California. The case was terminated on 06/28/1994.
A lawsuit records allegations and procedural activity. Being named as a party does not establish liability, wrongdoing, or the merits of any claim.
- Court
- District Court, N.D. California (N.D. Cal.)
Official Court Website → - Assigned judge
- Ronald M. Whyte · 3,442 cases in index
- Docket number
- 5:93-cv-20215
- Nature of suit
- 830 Patent
Infringement of a patented invention. - Jurisdiction
- Federal question
- Date filed
- 03/30/1993
- Date terminated
- 06/28/1994
5,393 Patent cases in this court are indexed here.
About Patent Lawsuits
Patent lawsuits allege infringement of a patented invention — that another party made, used, or sold a protected technology without authorization. These cases are common in technology and pharmaceutical industries.
Frequently Asked Questions
What is Gill v. Pinckard?
Gill v. Pinckard is a federal patent lawsuit filed on 03/30/1993 in the District Court, N.D. California. The case was terminated on 06/28/1994. Patent lawsuits allege infringement of a patented invention — that another party made, used, or sold a protected technology without authorization. These cases are common in technology and pharmaceutical industries.
What type of case is this?
It is classified as “Patent” under the federal nature-of-suit system. Patent lawsuits allege infringement of a patented invention — that another party made, used, or sold a protected technology without authorization. These cases are common in technology and pharmaceutical industries.
What court is the case in?
The case is in the District Court, N.D. California, docket number 5:93-cv-20215.
When was the case filed?
Gill v. Pinckard was filed on 03/30/1993. It was terminated on 06/28/1994.
Other Cases Involving These Parties
Related Patent Cases
Source: public U.S. federal court record — docket 9846980 in the CourtListener/RECAP archive (verify this docket), court docket number 5:93-cv-20215 on PACER. Court, party, date and judge fields are reproduced from that record; case-type categories, statute decoding and all aggregate figures are derived by Docket Nexus (methodology).