Giri v. Schaap
Giri v. Schaap is a federal patent lawsuit filed on 03/02/1995 in the District Court, E.D. Michigan. The case was terminated on 07/14/1998.
A lawsuit records allegations and procedural activity. Being named as a party does not establish liability, wrongdoing, or the merits of any claim.
- Court
- District Court, E.D. Michigan (E.D. Mich.)
Official Court Website → - Assigned judge
- George E Woods · 2,139 cases in index
- Docket number
- 2:95-cv-70798
- Nature of suit
- 830 Patent
Infringement of a patented invention. - Jurisdiction
- Federal question
- Date filed
- 03/02/1995
- Date terminated
- 07/14/1998
1,589 Patent cases in this court are indexed here.
About Patent Lawsuits
Patent lawsuits allege infringement of a patented invention — that another party made, used, or sold a protected technology without authorization. These cases are common in technology and pharmaceutical industries.
Frequently Asked Questions
What is Giri v. Schaap?
Giri v. Schaap is a federal patent lawsuit filed on 03/02/1995 in the District Court, E.D. Michigan. The case was terminated on 07/14/1998. Patent lawsuits allege infringement of a patented invention — that another party made, used, or sold a protected technology without authorization. These cases are common in technology and pharmaceutical industries.
What type of case is this?
It is classified as “Patent” under the federal nature-of-suit system. Patent lawsuits allege infringement of a patented invention — that another party made, used, or sold a protected technology without authorization. These cases are common in technology and pharmaceutical industries.
What court is the case in?
The case is in the District Court, E.D. Michigan, docket number 2:95-cv-70798.
When was the case filed?
Giri v. Schaap was filed on 03/02/1995. It was terminated on 07/14/1998.
Other Cases Involving These Parties
Related Patent Cases
Source: public U.S. federal court record — docket 10584641 in the CourtListener/RECAP archive (verify this docket), court docket number 2:95-cv-70798 on PACER. Court, party, date and judge fields are reproduced from that record; case-type categories, statute decoding and all aggregate figures are derived by Docket Nexus (methodology).