Gissin v. Jarkoi
Gissin v. Jarkoi is a federal contract lawsuit filed on 10/30/2017 in the District Court, D. New Jersey. The case was terminated on 11/30/2018.
- Court
- District Court, D. New Jersey (D.N.J.)
Official Court Website → - Assigned judge
- Madeline Cox Arleo · 2,371 cases in index
- Docket number
- 2:17-cv-10097
- Cause
- 28:1332 Diversity - Stockholders Suits
28 U.S.C. § 1332 — Diversity jurisdiction - Nature of suit
- 160 Stockholders Suits
Shareholder actions against a corporation or its officers and directors. - Jurisdiction
- Diversity
- Jury demand
- Plaintiff
- Date filed
- 10/30/2017
- Date terminated
- 11/30/2018
34,947 Contract cases in this court are indexed here.
About Contract Lawsuits
Contract lawsuits involve disputes over an agreement between parties — claims that one side failed to perform, breached a term, or owes money under a contract. Common examples include unpaid invoices, broken business deals, and warranty or insurance disputes.
Frequently Asked Questions
What is Gissin v. Jarkoi?
Gissin v. Jarkoi is a federal contract lawsuit filed on 10/30/2017 in the District Court, D. New Jersey. The case was terminated on 11/30/2018. Contract lawsuits involve disputes over an agreement between parties — claims that one side failed to perform, breached a term, or owes money under a contract. Common examples include unpaid invoices, broken business deals, and warranty or insurance disputes.
What type of case is this?
It is classified as “Contract” under the federal nature-of-suit system. Contract lawsuits involve disputes over an agreement between parties — claims that one side failed to perform, breached a term, or owes money under a contract. Common examples include unpaid invoices, broken business deals, and warranty or insurance disputes.
What court is the case in?
The case is in the District Court, D. New Jersey, docket number 2:17-cv-10097.
When was the case filed?
Gissin v. Jarkoi was filed on 10/30/2017. It was terminated on 11/30/2018.
What law is the case brought under?
The docket lists the cause as 28 U.S.C. § 1332 — Diversity jurisdiction.
Other Cases Involving These Parties
Related Contract Cases
Source: public U.S. federal court record (docket 6184641).