Glazman v. Citigroup, Inc
Glazman v. Citigroup, Inc is a federal civil rights lawsuit filed on 03/16/2026 in the District Court, M.D. Florida. The case was terminated on 05/20/2026.
A lawsuit records allegations and procedural activity. Being named as a party does not establish liability, wrongdoing, or the merits of any claim.
- Court
- District Court, M.D. Florida (M.D. Fla.)
Official Court Website → - Assigned judge
- Carlos E. Mendoza · 2,391 cases in index
- Docket number
- 6:26-cv-00555
- Cause
- 42:2000e Job Discrimination (Employment)
42 U.S.C. § 2000e — Title VII (employment discrimination) - Nature of suit
- 442 Civil Rights: Jobs
Employment-discrimination claims under Title VII and related statutes. - Jurisdiction
- Federal Question
- Jury demand
- Plaintiff
- Date filed
- 03/16/2026
- Date terminated
- 05/20/2026
33,103 Civil Rights cases in this court are indexed here.
Parties
- plaintiff · Glazman · 4 cases
- defendant · Citigroup, Inc Banking & Financial Institutions · 764 cases
Filings & Documents
-
#2 · Motion for Leave to File Documents Electronically as a Pro Se Litigant by Yuliya Glazman. Certificate)
- Certificate of Service
- Local Rule 3.01 (g
-
#2 · Motion for Leave to File Documents Electronically as a Pro Se Litigant by Yuliya Glazman. Certificate)
- Certificate of Service
- Local Rule 3.01 (g
-
#10 · Motion to Dismiss for Lack of Jurisdiction and Compel Arbitration by Citigroup, Inc. (Adler-Paindiris, Stephanie) Modified Text on 4/9/2026
- Exhibit a
- Exhibit B
-
#10 · Motion to Dismiss for Lack of Jurisdiction and Compel Arbitration by Citigroup, Inc. (Adler-Paindiris, Stephanie) Modified Text on 4/9/2026
- Exhibit a
- Exhibit B
-
#10 · Motion to Dismiss for Lack of Jurisdiction and Compel Arbitration by Citigroup, Inc. (Adler-Paindiris, Stephanie) Modified Text on 4/9/2026
- Exhibit a
- Exhibit B
- #9 · Notice of Lead Counsel Designation by Stephanie Leigh Adler-Paindiris on Behalf of Citigroup, Inc.. Lead Counsel: Stephanie Adler-Paindiris. (Adler-Paindiris, Stephanie) 04/08/2026 Get from PACER →
- #13 · Order on Discovery Motions. Signed by Magistrate Judge Nathan W. Hill on 4/9/2026 04/09/2026 · 2 pp View →
- #14 · Motion to Stay Discovery Rule 26 (f) Conference and Discovery by Citigroup, Inc. (Adler-Paindiris, Stephanie) Modified Text on 4/13/2026 04/10/2026 · 7 pp View →
- Order on Motion for Leave to File Document 04/13/2026 PACER only
- #15 · Endorsed Order Denying Without Prejudice 2 Motion for Permission to Electronically File Documents Using Cm/ecf. This District's Cm/ecf Administrative Procedures State That "[a]bsent a Court Order, a Pro Se Litigant Is Not Permitted to File Documents in Cm/ecf." Administrative Procedures for Electronic Filing, § B (4), United States District Court for the Middle District of Florida (effective August 1, 2025). a Pro Se Litigant May Only Obtain Access to E-filing with a Showing of Good Cause. See Fischer V. Dist. Sch. Bd. of Collier Cnty., No. 2:10-cv-512-FtM-29SPC, 2010 WL 3522215, at *1 (M.D. Fla. Sept. 7, 2010); Gerow V. Blackwell, No. 8:24-cv-02280-KKM-NHA, 2024 WL 4679030 (M.D. Fla. Nov. 5, 2024). Here, Plaintiff Has Not Identified Any Specific Circumstance in This Case Constituting "good Cause" for E-filing Access. See Fischer, 2010 WL 3522215, at *1. the Court Will, However, Permit Plaintiff to Receive Documents Via Email Rather Than by U.S. Mail, as the Considerations Discussed Above Do Not Apply to a Pro Se Party's Means of Receiving Documents. If Plaintiff Desires to Receive Service of Documents Via Email Instead of Physical Mail, Plaintiff May File a Notice Indicating Consent to Receive Service of Documents Via Email and Providing the Email to Which Documents Should Be Served.. Signed by Magistrate Judge Nathan W. Hill on 4/13/2026. (Hill, Nathan) 04/13/2026 Get from PACER →
- #16 · Order to Show Cause. Responses Due 4/24/2026. See Order for Details and Directions. Signed by Magistrate Judge Nathan W. Hill on 4/14/2026 04/14/2026 · 3 pp View →
- #17 · Response in Opposition re 14 Motion to Stay Discovery Rule 26 (f) Conference and Discovery Filed by Yuliya Glazman 04/16/2026 · 6 pp View →
- #18 · Urgent Motion for Extension of Time to Respond to 16 Order to Show Cause by Yuliya Glazman. (Chambers Notified) Modified on 4/22/2026 to Edit Docket Text 04/22/2026 Get from PACER →
- Notice of Hearing 04/23/2026 PACER only
- Order on Motion for Extension of Time to File Response / Reply 04/23/2026 PACER only
- #19 · Endorsed Order Denying 18 Motion for Extension of Time. However, a Hearing on the 16 Order Will Be Set by Separate Notice. the Court Will Not Take Action on the 16 Order Until After That Hearing. Signed by Magistrate Judge Nathan W. Hill on 4/23/2026 04/23/2026 Get from PACER →
- #20 · Notice of Hearing: Re: 16 Order to Show Cause Show Cause Hearing Set for 4/28/2026 at 10:00 AM in Zoom Video Conference Before Magistrate Judge Nathan W. Hill. Zoom ID and Password Will Be Provided by Email; Business Attire Is Required for All Zoom Hearings. Attorneys Are Required to Appear with Their Cameras on Unless the Court Has Granted in Advance Leave to Appear Telephonically 04/23/2026 Get from PACER →
- #21 · Response to Order to Show Cause re 16 Order to Show Cause Filed by Citigroup, Inc.. (Adler-Paindiris, Stephanie) 04/23/2026 · 3 pp View →
- #22 · Amended Complaint Against Citigroup, Inc., Citibank, N.A. with Jury Demand, Filed by Yuliya Glazman. Related Document: 1 Complaint Filed by Yuliya Glazman 04/23/2026 · 40 pp View →
-
#23 · Response of Non-Opposition to Order to Show Cause re 16 Order to Show Cause Filed by Yuliya Glazman
- Declaration
- #24 · Notice of Non-Consent to Service by Electronic Means by Yuliya Glazman re 15 Endorsed Order 04/23/2026 Get from PACER →
- #25 · Motion to Transfer Action to the Tampa Division Pursuant to Local Rule 1.04 (b) by Yuliya Glazman 04/23/2026 · 6 pp View →
- Order on Motion for Miscellaneous Relief 04/27/2026 PACER only
-
#26 · Urgent Motion for Miscellaneous Relief, Specifically to Vacate 20 Notice of Hearing by Yuliya Glazman. (chambers Notified)
- Exhibit a
-
#26 · Urgent Motion for Miscellaneous Relief, Specifically to Vacate 20 Notice of Hearing by Yuliya Glazman. (chambers Notified)
- Exhibit a
- #27 · Endorsed Order Granting in Part and Denying in Part 26 Plaintiff's Urgent Motion to Vacate April 28, 2026 Hearing. to the Extent Plaintiff Requests That Court Cancel the Hearing on April 28, 2026, the Motion Is Granted. the April 28, 2026 Hearing Is Cancelled. in All Other Respects, the Motion Is Denied. Signed by Magistrate Judge Nathan W. Hill on 4/27/2026 04/27/2026 Get from PACER →
- Notice of Hearing - Cancel 04/28/2026 PACER only
- #28 · Notice Canceling Order to Show Cause Hearing 16 Scheduled for 04/28/2026 04/28/2026 Get from PACER →
-
#29 · Motion to Dismiss First Amended Complaint and Compel Arbitration by Citibank, N.A., Citigroup, Inc.. (Adler-Paindiris, Stephanie) Motions Referred to Magistrate Judge Nathan W. Hill. Modified Text on 5/6/2026
- Affidavit Declaration of Sandrina Wilson
- Exhibit a - Decl. of S. Wilson
- Exhibit B - Decl. of S. Wilson
-
#29 · Motion to Dismiss First Amended Complaint and Compel Arbitration by Citibank, N.A., Citigroup, Inc.. (Adler-Paindiris, Stephanie) Motions Referred to Magistrate Judge Nathan W. Hill. Modified Text on 5/6/2026
- Affidavit Declaration of Sandrina Wilson
- Exhibit a - Decl. of S. Wilson
- Exhibit B - Decl. of S. Wilson
-
#29 · Motion to Dismiss First Amended Complaint and Compel Arbitration by Citibank, N.A., Citigroup, Inc.. (Adler-Paindiris, Stephanie) Motions Referred to Magistrate Judge Nathan W. Hill. Modified Text on 5/6/2026
- Affidavit Declaration of Sandrina Wilson
- Exhibit a - Decl. of S. Wilson
- Exhibit B - Decl. of S. Wilson
-
#29 · Motion to Dismiss First Amended Complaint and Compel Arbitration by Citibank, N.A., Citigroup, Inc.. (Adler-Paindiris, Stephanie) Motions Referred to Magistrate Judge Nathan W. Hill. Modified Text on 5/6/2026
- Affidavit Declaration of Sandrina Wilson
- Exhibit a - Decl. of S. Wilson
- Exhibit B - Decl. of S. Wilson
- #30 · Disclosure Statement Under Rule 7.1, Federal Rules of Civil Procedure, and Local Rule 3.03 by Citibank, N.A. Identifying Corporate Parent Citicorp LLC, Corporate Parent Citigroup Inc for Citibank, N.A... (Adler-Paindiris, Stephanie) 05/15/2026 Get from PACER →
- #31 · Time-Sensitive Motion for Expedited Disposition re 25 Motion to Transfer Action to the Tampa Division Pursuant to Local Rule 1.04 (b) by Yuliya Glazman. (Chambers Notified) 05/18/2026 Get from PACER →
- #32 · It Is Ordered and Adjudged That Plaintiff's Unopposed Motion to Transfer Venue Under Local Rule 1.04 (b) (Doc. 25) Is Granted. Plaintiff's Time-Sensitive Motion for Expedited Disposition of Motion to Transfer (Doc. 31) Is Granted. This Case Is Transferred to the United States District Court for the Middle District of Florida, Tampa Division for All Further Proceedings. the Clerk Is Directed to Close This Case. Signed by Judge Carlos E. Mendoza on 5/18/2026 05/18/2026 Get from PACER →
-
#33 · Unilateral Case Management Report
- Exhibit a
-
#34 · Motion for Leave to File Second Amended and Supplemental Complaint 22 Amended Complaint by Yuliya Glazman
- Exhibit a
-
#34 · Motion for Leave to File Second Amended and Supplemental Complaint 22 Amended Complaint by Yuliya Glazman
- Exhibit a
- Division Transfer Out 05/20/2026 PACER only
- #35 · Transfer to Tampa Division and Assigned Case Number 8:26-cv-01522-CEH-AEP 05/20/2026 Get from PACER →
These are public U.S. federal court records. Filings already in the free RECAP archive are readable here at no charge. Filings not yet in the archive must be obtained from PACER, the federal judiciary's own system, which charges its standard per-page fee — “Get from PACER” opens that docket entry on CourtListener, which can retrieve it. Docket number 6:26-cv-00555 in the District Court, M.D. Florida identifies the case in either system.
Other Cases Naming This Defendant
Citigroup, Inc is named in 764 federal civil cases in this index. Recent Civil Rights cases naming the same defendant:
About Civil Rights Lawsuits
Civil rights lawsuits allege violations of constitutional or statutory rights, including employment discrimination, voting rights, disability access, and claims against government actors. Employment-discrimination claims are among the most common in federal court.
Frequently Asked Questions
What is Glazman v. Citigroup, Inc?
Glazman v. Citigroup, Inc is a federal civil rights lawsuit filed on 03/16/2026 in the District Court, M.D. Florida. The case was terminated on 05/20/2026. Civil rights lawsuits allege violations of constitutional or statutory rights, including employment discrimination, voting rights, disability access, and claims against government actors. Employment-discrimination claims are among the most common in federal court.
What type of case is this?
It is classified as “Civil Rights” under the federal nature-of-suit system. Civil rights lawsuits allege violations of constitutional or statutory rights, including employment discrimination, voting rights, disability access, and claims against government actors. Employment-discrimination claims are among the most common in federal court.
What court is the case in?
The case is in the District Court, M.D. Florida, docket number 6:26-cv-00555.
When was the case filed?
Glazman v. Citigroup, Inc was filed on 03/16/2026. It was terminated on 05/20/2026.
What law is the case brought under?
The docket lists the cause as 42 U.S.C. § 2000e — Title VII (employment discrimination).
Other Cases Involving These Parties
Related Civil Rights Cases
Source: public U.S. federal court record — docket 72507984 in the CourtListener/RECAP archive (verify this docket), court docket number 6:26-cv-00555 on PACER. Court, party, date and judge fields are reproduced from that record; case-type categories, statute decoding and all aggregate figures are derived by Docket Nexus (methodology).