Gleeson v. Tei Elect. Contract
Gleeson v. Tei Elect. Contract is a federal labor lawsuit filed on 03/29/1989 in the District Court, District of Columbia. The case was terminated on 09/19/1989.
- Court
- District Court, District of Columbia (D.D.C.)
Official Court Website → - Assigned judge
- Harold H. Greene · 1,299 cases in index
- Docket number
- 1:89-cv-00838
- Nature of suit
- 791 Employee Retirement Income Security Act
Disputes over employee benefit and pension plans under ERISA. - Jurisdiction
- Federal question
- Date filed
- 03/29/1989
- Date terminated
- 09/19/1989
6,101 Labor cases in this court are indexed here.
Parties
- plaintiff · Gleeson · 69 cases
- defendant · Tei Elect. Contract · 4 cases
About Labor Lawsuits
Labor lawsuits involve the employment relationship — unpaid wages and overtime under the Fair Labor Standards Act, union and collective-bargaining disputes, employee benefits under ERISA, and family and medical leave claims.
Frequently Asked Questions
What is Gleeson v. Tei Elect. Contract?
Gleeson v. Tei Elect. Contract is a federal labor lawsuit filed on 03/29/1989 in the District Court, District of Columbia. The case was terminated on 09/19/1989. Labor lawsuits involve the employment relationship — unpaid wages and overtime under the Fair Labor Standards Act, union and collective-bargaining disputes, employee benefits under ERISA, and family and medical leave claims.
What type of case is this?
It is classified as “Labor” under the federal nature-of-suit system. Labor lawsuits involve the employment relationship — unpaid wages and overtime under the Fair Labor Standards Act, union and collective-bargaining disputes, employee benefits under ERISA, and family and medical leave claims.
What court is the case in?
The case is in the District Court, District of Columbia, docket number 1:89-cv-00838.
When was the case filed?
Gleeson v. Tei Elect. Contract was filed on 03/29/1989. It was terminated on 09/19/1989.
Other Cases Involving These Parties
Related Labor Cases
Source: public U.S. federal court record (docket 8935705).