Goldstein v. Habeeb
Goldstein v. Habeeb is a federal other civil lawsuit filed on 02/06/2003 in the District Court, N.D. Texas. The case was terminated on 01/06/2004.
A lawsuit records allegations and procedural activity. Being named as a party does not establish liability, wrongdoing, or the merits of any claim.
- Court
- District Court, N.D. Texas (N.D. Tex.)
Official Court Website → - Assigned judge
- David C Godbey · 3,702 cases in index
- Docket number
- 3:03-cv-00266
- Cause
- 28:1338 Copyright Infringement
28 U.S.C. § 1338 — Patent, copyright & trademark jurisdiction - Nature of suit
- 810 810
These are federal civil cases that do not fall under a more specific nature-of-suit category. - Jurisdiction
- Federal Question
- Jury demand
- None
- Date filed
- 02/06/2003
- Date terminated
- 01/06/2004
1,781 Other Civil cases in this court are indexed here.
About Other Civil Lawsuits
These are federal civil cases that do not fall under a more specific nature-of-suit category.
Frequently Asked Questions
What is Goldstein v. Habeeb?
Goldstein v. Habeeb is a federal other civil lawsuit filed on 02/06/2003 in the District Court, N.D. Texas. The case was terminated on 01/06/2004. These are federal civil cases that do not fall under a more specific nature-of-suit category.
What type of case is this?
It is classified as “Other Civil” under the federal nature-of-suit system. These are federal civil cases that do not fall under a more specific nature-of-suit category.
What court is the case in?
The case is in the District Court, N.D. Texas, docket number 3:03-cv-00266.
When was the case filed?
Goldstein v. Habeeb was filed on 02/06/2003. It was terminated on 01/06/2004.
What law is the case brought under?
The docket lists the cause as 28 U.S.C. § 1338 — Patent, copyright & trademark jurisdiction.
Other Cases Involving These Parties
Related Other Civil Cases
Source: public U.S. federal court record — docket 6154063 in the CourtListener/RECAP archive (verify this docket), court docket number 3:03-cv-00266 on PACER. Court, party, date and judge fields are reproduced from that record; case-type categories, statute decoding and all aggregate figures are derived by Docket Nexus (methodology).